Re: OT:Repugs take Massachusettes
- From: "Tom S." <tmswork@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 07:21:31 -0700
On 1/20/2010 8:43 PM, Skippy11 wrote:
"Mickey"<Mickey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in messageThe word is "parasite", but Paul thinks parasites are people that don't like being ripped off.
"Paul M. Cook"<pmcook@xxxxxxx> wrote:It is a problem when you are looking for a freebie. The problem that Paul
"CigarBaron"<garbaron67j@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in messageWHAT PROBLEM? Why is no one even bothering to challenge the ONE!'s
On Jan 19, 12:32 pm, "Paul M. Cook"<pmc...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Might as well concede. Nate Silver has called it, repugs 3:1. It's allYahoo!!!!!!!!!! Another nail into the Democrats' health care
over - well not including the voting.
Yep, the operation was a complete success. However, the patient died.
Despite the smugness, the problem lingers on
underlying premise that we have a "health care crisis"? We don't.
No one in this country is turned away when they need "health care". No
one is dying in the streets for lack of care. AN ambulance is just a
phone call away for ANYONE who needs one.
Could thing's be improved? Of course they could! But a huge new
bureaucracy is not what is needed to help.
When an engine is chugging a little, and maybe misfiring a little bit,
the solution is>NOT< to put another huge load on it.
and that is not good for
anyone - even yourself.
has with healthcare is deciding to pay for it.
- Prev by Date: Re: Oh, my
- Next by Date: Re: I hope it's true
- Previous by thread: Re: OT:Repugs take Massachusettes
- Next by thread: Re: OT:Repugs take Massachusettes