Re: Climategate? Not so much
- From: Buck Turgidson <deppitybob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 00:56:37 -0500
In article <19t3ng898xg6e$.1ba03rhg5fqm7.dlg@xxxxxxxxxx>,
"Alex W." <ingilt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The "enlightened" Creationists will admit that animals can genetically
change, since that's how we breed them. But they'll deny spontaneous
speciation (usually using ridiculous comparisons like "A dog can't just
become a frog one day!").
Even more ridiculous as we are quite capable of inducing
speciation ourselves. Donkey egg plus horse sperm makes mule.
Ditto tigers and lions.
Well, those aren't new species because they can't reproduce. Seriously.
That's one of the definitions of a species.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Climategate? Not so much
- From: Alex W.
- Re: Climategate? Not so much
- From: Tony
- Re: Climategate? Not so much
- References:
- Climategate? Not so much
- From: Buck Turgidson
- Re: Climategate? Not so much
- From: Miss Elaine Eos
- Re: Climategate? Not so much
- From: Joe
- Re: Climategate? Not so much
- From: Paul M. Cook
- Re: Climategate? Not so much
- From: Miss Elaine Eos
- Re: Climategate? Not so much
- From: Buck Turgidson
- Re: Climategate? Not so much
- From: Mickey
- Re: Climategate? Not so much
- From: Tom S.
- Re: Climategate? Not so much
- From: Mickey
- Re: Climategate? Not so much
- From: Tom S.
- Re: Climategate? Not so much
- From: Alex W.
- Re: Climategate? Not so much
- From: Buck Turgidson
- Re: Climategate? Not so much
- From: Alex W.
- Climategate? Not so much
- Prev by Date: Re: Excellent speech on NY gay marriage bill
- Next by Date: Re: 22 million Bush era e-mails found...
- Previous by thread: Re: Climategate? Not so much
- Next by thread: Re: Climategate? Not so much
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|