Re: Climategate? Not so much
- From: Mickey <Mickey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 12:40:56 -0600
"Tom S." <tmswork@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On 12/13/2009 7:00 AM, trogdor wrote:
Hard to do "science" with blinders on, deeply engulfed in denial.
"Buck Turgidson" <deppitybob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:deppitybob-9BF5E0.03113713122009@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://tinyurl.com/yedvcoj
AP IMPACT: Science not faked, but not pretty
so now the AP has better sience than the original seinetists - got it.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/12/12/aps-seth-borenstein-is-just-too-damn-cozy-with-the-people-he-covers-time-for-ap-to-do-somethig-about-it/
Maybe the "Jewish" science of 1930's Germany, or the "bourgeois science"
or Lamarkism of the old Soviet Union?
Buck shows he's as astute about science, law, economics, financial
markets, etc., as he is about aging cigars. ;-)
Phrenology is the only TRUE Science! ;-)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Climategate? Not so much
- From: CigarBaron
- Re: Climategate? Not so much
- From: trogdor
- Re: Climategate? Not so much
- From: Alex W.
- Re: Climategate? Not so much
- References:
- Climategate? Not so much
- From: Buck Turgidson
- Re: Climategate? Not so much
- From: trogdor
- Climategate? Not so much
- Prev by Date: Re: Secret Santa?
- Next by Date: Re: Climategate? Not so much
- Previous by thread: Re: Climategate? Not so much
- Next by thread: Re: Climategate? Not so much
- Index(es):