Re: Maybe this will get you to understand...
- From: Tony <tony@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 15:11:05 -0500
Paul M. Cook wrote:
"Buck Turgidson" <deppitybob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:deppitybob-2BBA00.00065622112009@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxIn article <ja-dndgmocuF4JrWnZ2dnUVZ_s5i4p2d@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Tom S." <tmswork@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Bob Borgeson wrote:A. I think you meant 2008.On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:16:11 -0500, Buck Turgidson wrote:It doesn't even say if they think the COUNT totals were accurate.
In article <q0odg5dl1osc6v4k9jqn3h0hd4bvb3plh0@xxxxxxx>,In fairness, an either / or question composed like that is pretty
Mickey <Mickey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Buck, this is a wad of crap. This has got to be some sort of cherryRead the actual question asked of people. "Do you think that President
picked push poll.
Obama legitimately won the Presidential election last year, or do you
think ACORN had it stolen for him?"
leading...
It was estimated that well over one MILLION votes were "stuffed" in the
2000 Presidential election. Not all that was ACRON, but they're the
biggest practitioners by several orders of magnitude and they know that
they, as opposed to Reubs, can get away with it.
2. Cite?
ACORN is the favorite scapegoat of the right to explain away how they lost everything. It has to be a corrupt election because - well - they lost. The fact is the 2000 election was not "stuffed" because voter fraud relies more heavily on disenfranchisement of otherwise legitimate voters. It was done in Florida and Ohio and probably every other state that had a sympathetic SoS. You simply nullify huge blocks of votes for reasons such as a crease in the corner. Or you just don't let them vote by signing them up to "felon purge" lists because they shared the same last name and first initial of a felon. Or you put 2 voting machines in a district with 20,000 voters (ethnic) and 20 machines in a district with 2,000 (white).
That's how it is done. Stuffing ballot boxes is way too easy to catch. Stalin know this all to well, it is not who cats the votes but who counts them.
Wow, Paul! You know all about voter fraud. You must be a Democrat.
--
The Cigar Diary: http://www.cigardiary.com
ASC Facebook Group: http://www.facebook.com/home.php#/group.php?gid=138059489225
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Maybe this will get you to understand...
- From: Paul M. Cook
- Re: Maybe this will get you to understand...
- References:
- Maybe this will get you to understand...
- From: Buck Turgidson
- Re: Maybe this will get you to understand...
- From: Mickey
- Re: Maybe this will get you to understand...
- From: Buck Turgidson
- Re: Maybe this will get you to understand...
- From: Bob Borgeson
- Re: Maybe this will get you to understand...
- From: Tom S.
- Re: Maybe this will get you to understand...
- From: Buck Turgidson
- Re: Maybe this will get you to understand...
- From: Paul M. Cook
- Maybe this will get you to understand...
- Prev by Date: Re: Maybe this will get you to understand...
- Next by Date: Re: OT: The Last Nail in the AGW Coffin?
- Previous by thread: Re: Maybe this will get you to understand...
- Next by thread: Re: Maybe this will get you to understand...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|