Re: Continue cleaning up the poop!
- From: "Tom S." <tmswork@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2009 23:21:27 -0700
Miss Elaine Eos wrote:
In article <c8GdnWW-OcDfT1fXnZ2dnUVZ_tednZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Tom S."Actually, it did. The point made was about the right to "remain silent", which
<tmswork@xxxxxxx> wrote:
as best as I can see, you're conflating a "street level" confrontation
with what happens in court during proceedings.
Probably. I'll retract my earlier, since it didn't seem to add anything to
the discussion, and I'm probably mistaken, anyway.
was misunderstood by S&B, but whose wording was so mangled his point was doubley flawed. Even Mary seemingly misunderstood the law.
It might be beneficial to know what the law is in case some of Obama's minions confront you. :~)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Continue cleaning up the poop!
- From: Miss Elaine Eos
- Re: Continue cleaning up the poop!
- References:
- Re: Continue cleaning up the poop!
- From: Mickey
- Re: Continue cleaning up the poop!
- From: Tom S.
- Re: Continue cleaning up the poop!
- From: mary a.
- Re: Continue cleaning up the poop!
- From: Miss Elaine Eos
- Re: Continue cleaning up the poop!
- From: Tom S.
- Re: Continue cleaning up the poop!
- From: Miss Elaine Eos
- Re: Continue cleaning up the poop!
- From: Tom S.
- Re: Continue cleaning up the poop!
- From: Miss Elaine Eos
- Re: Continue cleaning up the poop!
- Prev by Date: Re: Olympics to Rio
- Next by Date: Re: Great Beef Stew for a Cold Day; Enjoy a Cigar Afterwards
- Previous by thread: Re: Continue cleaning up the poop!
- Next by thread: Re: Continue cleaning up the poop!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|