Re: TEA, anyone?
- From: "Bob D" <rdelaney99@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 00:31:38 -0400
Got one - but thanks for the offer! ;o)
"Tom S." <tmswork@xxxxxxx> wrote in message news:59CdnZoxRpLzQUnUnZ2dnUVZ_rudnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Bob D" <rdelaney99@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:PMGdnVHgPJGzO0nUnZ2dnUVZ_tCdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.Awww - I'm glad I stopped back to see what's happening on ASC after a five year hiatus - and that my attempt at satire was received in such a warm and friendly manner. ;o)Ah, so the basic rules of economics have changed?
My comment was based on the premise of a 19th century solution to a 21st century problem...
http://money.cnn.com/2008/05/16/news/economy/oil_speculator/index.htm
http://www.financialsense.com/editorials/engdahl/2008/0502.html
Have a delightfully positive day,
Or the workings of the markets?
Or risk management?
Get a life.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: TEA, anyone?
- From: Tom S.
- Re: TEA, anyone?
- References:
- Re: TEA, anyone?
- From: Bob D
- Re: TEA, anyone?
- From: Tom S.
- Re: TEA, anyone?
- Prev by Date: Re: The President on Leno
- Next by Date: Re: Write to your Congresscritter!
- Previous by thread: Re: TEA, anyone?
- Next by thread: Re: TEA, anyone?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|