Re: REVIEW: _Religious_

Bart Goddard wrote:
"btorvik2" <btorvik2@xxxxxxx> wrote in news:6j7f89F1q779U1
@mid.individual.net:


Ah the classic "negative proof" argument gambit.

bernie..I expected better from you, Bart :-)

Thanks for the insult. I didn't ask for negative proof.
I asked for the basis of his opinion. I really want to
know whether he dreamed it up while in a cigar and scotch
induce reverie, or did he perform an experiment or did
he read it in a book which he considers to be authoritative
or <whatever>. It's just a question.

B.

Er, I was referring specifically to this statement.

" You might have a point if someone can cite some actual evidence
that God doesn't exist. But I doubt they can.

B.

bernie


--
"Official ASC Shaman"


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: REVIEW: _Religious_
    ... Thanks for the insult. ... I didn't ask for negative proof. ... I asked for the basis of his opinion. ...
    (alt.smokers.cigars)
  • Re: Some interesting snippets from the Libertarian rag...
    ... Bart Goddard wrote: ... When it comes to math, in this group, you may well be. ... This is the same insult. ... It's always telling that folks are willing to go round and round ...
    (alt.smokers.cigars)
  • Re: Healthcare in Canada
    ... Bart Goddard wrote: ... perceived an insult. ... Insults are not "ad hominem". ... the very canonical example of an ad-hominem argument, ...
    (alt.smokers.cigars)
  • Re: ASC = 5
    ... Bart Goddard wrote: ... and we'll re-admit you on a trial ... basis if you send each of us a nice Cuban sampler and then post unceasingly about your political and religious ...
    (alt.smokers.cigars)
  • Re: National Keep-Your-Child-at-Home-Day
    ... Bart Goddard wrote: ... All you've done is insult me and then have the cheek to say ... Calling someone disingenuous is ...
    (alt.smokers.cigars)