Re: REVIEW: _Religious_

"btorvik2" <btorvik2@xxxxxxx> wrote in news:6j7f89F1q779U1

Ah the classic "negative proof" argument gambit.

bernie..I expected better from you, Bart :-)

Thanks for the insult. I didn't ask for negative proof.
I asked for the basis of his opinion. I really want to
know whether he dreamed it up while in a cigar and scotch
induce reverie, or did he perform an experiment or did
he read it in a book which he considers to be authoritative
or <whatever>. It's just a question.


Cheerfully resisting change since 1959.