Re: REVIEW: _Religious_
- From: "trogdor" <tdeto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2008 08:26:06 -0400
"Miss Elaine Eos" <Misc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:Misc-6C4C79.20291813092008@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Uh... no. Hell, we have better historical evidence of my birth,
schooling, civil service, marriage, automotive & home purchases. The
historic record on me > Please take off your pants or I won't read your e-mail.
I will not, no matter how "good" the deal, patronise any business which sends
unsolicited commercial e-mail or that advertises in discussion newsgroups.
a 5er from you would go a long way in disproveing that you are a rummination of a bit of beef I et.
.
- References:
- Re: REVIEW: _Religious_
- From: Winston Castro
- Re: REVIEW: _Religious_
- From: Bart Goddard
- Re: REVIEW: _Religious_
- From: Miss Elaine Eos
- Re: REVIEW: _Religious_
- From: Bart Goddard
- Re: REVIEW: _Religious_
- From: Miss Elaine Eos
- Re: REVIEW: _Religious_
- From: Bart Goddard
- Re: REVIEW: _Religious_
- From: Alex W.
- Re: REVIEW: _Religious_
- From: Bart Goddard
- Re: REVIEW: _Religious_
- From: Justin C
- Re: REVIEW: _Religious_
- From: Bart Goddard
- Re: REVIEW: _Religious_
- From: Justin C
- Re: REVIEW: _Religious_
- From: Bart Goddard
- Re: REVIEW: _Religious_
- From: Alex W.
- Re: REVIEW: _Religious_
- From: Bart Goddard
- Re: REVIEW: _Religious_
- From: Miss Elaine Eos
- Re: REVIEW: _Religious_
- Prev by Date: Re: Did you survive Mickey?????
- Next by Date: Re: The second coming?
- Previous by thread: Re: REVIEW: _Religious_
- Next by thread: Re: REVIEW: _Religious_
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|