Re: Well, duh!
- From: "Paul M. Cook" <pmcook@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2008 08:21:54 GMT
"Paul M. Cook" <pmcook@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Xg_1k.16440$BY1.15476@xxxxxxxxxxx
"Alex W." <ingilt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:6ar8ktF3994kaU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Miss Elaine Eos" <Misc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Misc-0163EB.20062404062008@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In article <U0D1k.3481$t07.3142@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Tom S." <t.m.s.work@xxxxxxx> wrote:
http://www.koaradio.com/cc-common/mlib/668/10/668_1192208250.jpg
The top 1% of earners make 21% of the money...?! Day-em!
I guess it makes sense. I mean, the top 1% is easily worth 20x what a
50th-%ile-er is worth, productivity & salary wise. I guess I just never
really thought about it or saw it on a graph, before...
Is that inclusive or exclusive of such incredibly productive and
well-remunerated people as professional athletes, or the heirs to large
fortunes?
Not to mention tequila loving hotel heiresses who like to flash their
cookie to the paparazzi.
Or better yet this guy.
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/years/2008/0605082nicholas1.html
Paul
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Well, duh!
- From: Joe
- Re: Well, duh!
- References:
- Well, duh!
- From: Mickey
- Re: Well, duh!
- From: Paul M. Cook
- Re: Well, duh!
- From: Mickey
- Re: Well, duh!
- From: Tom S.
- Re: Well, duh!
- From: Paul M. Cook
- Re: Well, duh!
- From: PadronMan©®
- Re: Well, duh!
- From: Tom S.
- Re: Well, duh!
- From: Paul M. Cook
- Re: Well, duh!
- From: Mickey
- Re: Well, duh!
- From: Tom S.
- Re: Well, duh!
- From: Tom S.
- Re: Well, duh!
- From: Miss Elaine Eos
- Re: Well, duh!
- From: Alex W.
- Re: Well, duh!
- From: Paul M. Cook
- Well, duh!
- Prev by Date: Re: A warning for my friends
- Next by Date: Re: Good short smokes
- Previous by thread: Re: Well, duh!
- Next by thread: Re: Well, duh!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|