Re: Well, duh!
- From: "Alex W." <ingilt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 23:46:13 +0100
"Miss Elaine Eos" <Misc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Misc-0163EB.20062404062008@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In article <U0D1k.3481$t07.3142@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Tom S." <t.m.s.work@xxxxxxx> wrote:
http://www.koaradio.com/cc-common/mlib/668/10/668_1192208250.jpg
The top 1% of earners make 21% of the money...?! Day-em!
I guess it makes sense. I mean, the top 1% is easily worth 20x what a
50th-%ile-er is worth, productivity & salary wise. I guess I just never
really thought about it or saw it on a graph, before...
Is that inclusive or exclusive of such incredibly productive and
well-remunerated people as professional athletes, or the heirs to large
fortunes?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Well, duh!
- From: Paul M. Cook
- Re: Well, duh!
- References:
- Well, duh!
- From: Mickey
- Re: Well, duh!
- From: Paul M. Cook
- Re: Well, duh!
- From: Mickey
- Re: Well, duh!
- From: Tom S.
- Re: Well, duh!
- From: Paul M. Cook
- Re: Well, duh!
- From: PadronMan©®
- Re: Well, duh!
- From: Tom S.
- Re: Well, duh!
- From: Paul M. Cook
- Re: Well, duh!
- From: Mickey
- Re: Well, duh!
- From: Tom S.
- Re: Well, duh!
- From: Tom S.
- Re: Well, duh!
- From: Miss Elaine Eos
- Well, duh!
- Prev by Date: Re: Well, duh!
- Next by Date: Re: Good short smokes
- Previous by thread: Re: Well, duh!
- Next by thread: Re: Well, duh!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|