Re: tax question for accountants
- From: "Tom S." <t.m.s.work@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 3 May 2008 17:15:41 -0700
"Miss Elaine Eos" <Misc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Misc-A95D4A.14014103052008@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In article <D94Tj.111$tM1.24@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Tom S." <t.m.s.work@xxxxxxx> wrote:
"Marc Schneiderman" <garbaron@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:qqko14lpdco0fprtdh6b8cpr8bfg5fvvch@xxxxxxxxxx
On Fri, 02 May 2008 07:44:41 -0700, Miss Elaine Eos
<Misc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
One of your options is "well, Mr. Auditor, that's all very nice that
you
think that, but I think you're wrong, and I'm taking the deduction."
It's more like: we're not going to allow it and you owe us another
$40,000.
Yes, the IRS has that last word (and many of the first, second and middle
words as well).
Actually, there was a recent decision (2000? around there, somewhere)
that, in the event of a disagreement, the onus is on the IRS to
demonstrate where the law/tax-code has been violated. Prior to that
time, while "innocent until proven guilty" was a fine concept, the IRS
had largely run amok bullying people.
Judge: "What proof do you have that this deduction is not legitimate?"
IRS Agent: "Your honor, we said so!"
Judge: (Turning to defendant) GUILTY!
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: tax question for accountants
- From: btorvik2
- Re: tax question for accountants
- From: Miss Elaine Eos
- Re: tax question for accountants
- References:
- tax question for accountants
- From: Marc Schneiderman
- Re: tax question for accountants
- From: Paul M. Cook
- Re: tax question for accountants
- From: Marc Schneiderman
- Re: tax question for accountants
- From: Miss Elaine Eos
- Re: tax question for accountants
- From: Marc Schneiderman
- Re: tax question for accountants
- From: Tom S.
- Re: tax question for accountants
- From: Miss Elaine Eos
- tax question for accountants
- Prev by Date: Re: OT:What will you spend your rebate on?
- Next by Date: Re: OT:What will you spend your rebate on?
- Previous by thread: Re: tax question for accountants
- Next by thread: Re: tax question for accountants
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|