Re: Smoke two...
- From: Bart Goddard <goddardbe@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 23 Apr 2008 15:40:29 GMT
Mickey <Mickey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:16lu04loa1oa6jiks6ql5lg538uq2vev88@xxxxxxx:
2. Why can't I "have" the
right to something for nothing, as long as no one does
any labor to ensure it? (That is, if there is a sense of
"having" that doesn't include "ability to exercise", then
what's your big problem with my right to food stamps?)
This is ridiculous. Having a right includes the ability to exercise
it, or else you don't "have" it.
TA--DA!!! Take that Misc and TomS. (They have both flatly
denied this.)
B.
--
Cheerfully resisting change since 1959.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Smoke two...
- From: Miss Elaine Eos
- Re: Smoke two...
- References:
- Re: Smoke two...
- From: Alex W.
- Re: Smoke two...
- From: Bart Goddard
- Re: Smoke two...
- From: Mickey
- Re: Smoke two...
- From: Bart Goddard
- Re: Smoke two...
- From: Mickey
- Re: Smoke two...
- From: Bart Goddard
- Re: Smoke two...
- From: Miss Elaine Eos
- Re: Smoke two...
- From: Bart Goddard
- Re: Smoke two...
- From: Mickey
- Re: Smoke two...
- From: Bart Goddard
- Re: Smoke two...
- From: Mickey
- Re: Smoke two...
- Prev by Date: Re: Smoke two...
- Next by Date: Re: Smoke two...
- Previous by thread: Re: Smoke two...
- Next by thread: Re: Smoke two...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|