Re: [OT] Decent beginner's layman's logic text?
- From: Mickey <Mickey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 19:51:40 -0600
Justin C <justin.0802@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article <SwLwj.2029$XO4.1934@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Tom S. wrote:
"Miss Elaine Eos" <Misc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Misc-6F9CA4.18552025022008@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Have you read "Ganders for Dummies"?.
Maybe they're better, now. I'll go have a gander at that and the other
recommendations...
The guy who wrote that knew nothing on the subject, it was all geese work.
It sure ruffled his feathers when I pointed out to him how little he knew, he
was definitely quite irate when he said "Waddle you know about it anyway?"
Justin.
You're quacking me up, Justin.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [OT] Decent beginner's layman's logic text?
- From: Tom S.
- Re: [OT] Decent beginner's layman's logic text?
- From: Bart Goddard
- Re: [OT] Decent beginner's layman's logic text?
- References:
- [OT] Decent beginner's layman's logic text?
- From: Miss Elaine Eos
- Re: [OT] Decent beginner's layman's logic text?
- From: btorvik2
- Re: [OT] Decent beginner's layman's logic text?
- From: Miss Elaine Eos
- Re: [OT] Decent beginner's layman's logic text?
- From: Tom S.
- Re: [OT] Decent beginner's layman's logic text?
- From: Justin C
- [OT] Decent beginner's layman's logic text?
- Prev by Date: Re: [OT] Decent beginner's layman's logic text?
- Next by Date: Re: [OT] Decent beginner's layman's logic text?
- Previous by thread: Re: [OT] Decent beginner's layman's logic text?
- Next by thread: Re: [OT] Decent beginner's layman's logic text?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|