Re: Healthcare in Canada
- From: Marc Schneiderman <garbaron@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 08:54:41 -0500
On Sat, 12 Jan 2008 23:31:25 GMT, "Paul M. Cook"
<pmBERMUDA_SHORTScook@xxxxxxx> wrote:
"
The immunosuppressant drugs that would have been needed after a liver
transplant would very likely make her leukemia WORSE.
She would have had a 65% chance of surviving 6 months.
That should read "the first six months" which does not exclude life after
that.
Those are actually extremely good odds for a liver transplant as I undersand
it. The thing they do not say is what her odds were for living *after* six
months.
Actually Paul, the chance that the new liver would survive during
leukemia treatment without a recurrence of the leukemia is quite slim.
65% is gracious. However, after a year, the liver would be wasted and
the patient dead of leukemia. That liver should've gone to someone
with a better chance. These are all tough decisions.
CigarBaron
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Healthcare in Canada
- From: DHannes
- Re: Healthcare in Canada
- References:
- Re: Healthcare in Canada
- From: Marc Schneiderman
- Re: Healthcare in Canada
- From: Miss Elaine Eos
- Re: Healthcare in Canada
- From: Alex W.
- Re: Healthcare in Canada
- From: Mickey
- Re: Healthcare in Canada
- From: Alex W.
- Re: Healthcare in Canada
- From: Miss Elaine Eos
- Re: Healthcare in Canada
- From: Mickey
- Re: Healthcare in Canada
- From: Paul M. Cook
- Re: Healthcare in Canada
- From: Mickey
- Re: Healthcare in Canada
- From: Paul M. Cook
- Re: Healthcare in Canada
- Prev by Date: Re: Healthcare in Canada
- Next by Date: Re: Healthcare in Canada
- Previous by thread: Re: Healthcare in Canada
- Next by thread: Re: Healthcare in Canada
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|