Re: [OT] No income tax
- From: "Paul M. Cook" <pmBERMUDA_SHORTScook@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 04:33:40 GMT
"Ray" <chigarayCELLO@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:junuk3ptjgri9h86pf98hgt07c17c7ueon@xxxxxxxxxx
On 29 Nov 2007 17:52:59 GMT, Bart Goddard <goddardbe@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Mickey <Mickey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:6motk3d9lu4ii6mt2rk7cjfa1lfs7i8hat@xxxxxxx:
Think of the children! Velcro took away their ability to tie a bow.
Now you want to let them grow up not knowing what "1040" means!
B.
As a math guy, you can teach them that it's twice as much as 520. ;-)
I thought half of 1040 was 1040A.
B.
How did you reach that deduction?
Looks pretty standard to me.
Paul
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [OT] No income tax
- From: CigarSki
- Re: [OT] No income tax
- References:
- [OT] No income tax
- From: Miss Elaine Eos
- Re: [OT] No income tax
- From: Bart Goddard
- Re: [OT] No income tax
- From: Mickey
- Re: [OT] No income tax
- From: Bart Goddard
- [OT] No income tax
- Prev by Date: Re: Not to be smug or anything, but...
- Next by Date: Re: [OT] No income tax
- Previous by thread: Re: [OT] No income tax
- Next by thread: Re: [OT] No income tax
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|