Re: Not to be smug or anything, but...
- From: "Alex W." <ingilt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2007 22:21:28 -0000
"Mickey" <Mickey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:51ijk3himlto1c25vbphqttu6m4e58v009@xxxxxxxxxx
Padre <spirito_santo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 24 Nov., 20:02, Mickey <Mic...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Once again the Democrats are shown to be much bigger hypocrites. Both
sides are hypocritical at times, yes, for sure. But Democrats foment,
and then pander to the white liberal guilt of the wealthy.
I don't get it. What's wrong with being rich and voting democrat at
the same time?
Nothing, in and of itself. But being wealthy and then attempting to
use class envy to secure people's votes is hypocritical.
No more hypocritical than trying to garner votes by appealing to prejudices,
fears or greed. All parties are equally guilty in that regard; only their
choice of emotional trigger differs.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Not to be smug or anything, but...
- From: Miss Elaine Eos
- Re: Not to be smug or anything, but...
- From: Mickey
- Re: Not to be smug or anything, but...
- References:
- Not to be smug or anything, but...
- From: Mickey
- Re: Not to be smug or anything, but...
- From: Alex W.
- Re: Not to be smug or anything, but...
- From: Mickey
- Re: Not to be smug or anything, but...
- From: Alex W.
- Re: Not to be smug or anything, but...
- From: Mickey
- Re: Not to be smug or anything, but...
- From: Padre
- Re: Not to be smug or anything, but...
- From: Mickey
- Not to be smug or anything, but...
- Prev by Date: Re: Not to be smug or anything, but...
- Next by Date: Re: Smoke one...
- Previous by thread: Re: Not to be smug or anything, but...
- Next by thread: Re: Not to be smug or anything, but...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|