Re: Not to be smug or anything, but...
- From: Mickey <Mickey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2007 13:08:23 -0600
Padre <spirito_santo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 24 Nov., 20:02, Mickey <Mic...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Once again the Democrats are shown to be much bigger hypocrites. Both
sides are hypocritical at times, yes, for sure. But Democrats foment,
and then pander to the white liberal guilt of the wealthy.
I don't get it. What's wrong with being rich and voting democrat at
the same time?
Nothing, in and of itself. But being wealthy and then attempting to
use class envy to secure people's votes is hypocritical.
For example, John Edwards and his "two Americas" crap.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Not to be smug or anything, but...
- From: Padre
- Re: Not to be smug or anything, but...
- From: Alex W.
- Re: Not to be smug or anything, but...
- References:
- Not to be smug or anything, but...
- From: Mickey
- Re: Not to be smug or anything, but...
- From: Alex W.
- Re: Not to be smug or anything, but...
- From: Mickey
- Re: Not to be smug or anything, but...
- From: Alex W.
- Re: Not to be smug or anything, but...
- From: Mickey
- Re: Not to be smug or anything, but...
- From: Padre
- Not to be smug or anything, but...
- Prev by Date: Re: Not to be smug or anything, but...
- Next by Date: Re: Smoke one...
- Previous by thread: Re: Not to be smug or anything, but...
- Next by thread: Re: Not to be smug or anything, but...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|