Re: Not to be smug or anything, but...
- From: "COJ" <coj1961@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 12:43:51 +0100
"Justin C" <justin.0711@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> skrev i meddelandet
In article <fi8s1k$s2o$1@xxxxxxxx>, COJ wrote:all
"Mickey" <Mickey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> skrev i meddelandet
"Alex W." <ingilt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Mickey" <Mickey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in messageWe just call them "Democrats".
"Democrats like to define themselves as the party of poor and
middle-income Americans, but a new study says they now represent the
majority of the nation's wealthiest congressional districts."
We have a term for people like that in Britain: Champagne Socialists.
A far better word is politicians....as, as soon as you've filtrate away
job."the fancy wordings they are all the same....they are only in it for
Or as its so well put by Douglas Adams
"It is a well-known fact that those people who most want to rule people
are, ipso facto, those least suited to do it... anyone who is capable of
getting themselves elected should on no account be allowed to do the
It's not a new idea, Plato said pretty much the same around 400BC.
Justin C, by the sea.
Not read much by Platon(assuming thats what you meant)...but have read a lot
of Douglas Adams :-)
- Prev by Date: Re: Review: Cuba Aliados Candela Lonsdale
- Next by Date: Re: Not to be smug or anything, but...
- Previous by thread: Re: Not to be smug or anything, but...
- Next by thread: Re: Not to be smug or anything, but...