Re: Not to be smug or anything, but...

"Alex W." <ingilt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


"Mickey" <Mickey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:qb8ek3lo6cs85m2i1mj35k1lnq2d6jkd2p@xxxxxxxxxx


"Democrats like to define themselves as the party of poor and
middle-income Americans, but a new study says they now represent the
majority of the nation's wealthiest congressional districts."


We have a term for people like that in Britain: Champagne Socialists.


We just call them "Democrats".
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Not to be smug or anything, but...
    ... In article, COJ wrote: ... middle-income Americans, but a new study says they now represent the ... majority of the nation's wealthiest congressional districts." ...
    (alt.smokers.cigars)
  • Re: Not to be smug or anything, but...
    ... middle-income Americans, but a new study says they now represent the ... majority of the nation's wealthiest congressional districts." ... To believe Mickey is to believe the common lie perpetuated amongst the ...
    (alt.smokers.cigars)
  • Re: Not to be smug or anything, but...
    ... middle-income Americans, but a new study says they now represent the ... majority of the nation's wealthiest congressional districts." ... are, ipso facto, those least suited to do it... ...
    (alt.smokers.cigars)
  • Re: Not to be smug or anything, but...
    ... middle-income Americans, but a new study says they now represent the ... majority of the nation's wealthiest congressional districts." ... We have a term for people like that in Britain: Champagne Socialists. ...
    (alt.smokers.cigars)
  • Re: Not to be smug or anything, but...
    ... middle-income Americans, but a new study says they now represent the ... majority of the nation's wealthiest congressional districts." ... Or as its so well put by Douglas Adams ...
    (alt.smokers.cigars)