Re: Cigar tax defeated
- From: "Smokin' Travis" <Junk@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 21:53:00 -0400
"Joe" <joe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:ePWdna3bJLr07IzanZ2dnUVZ_j2dnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 08:23:51 -0700, Demonick wrote:
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 07:09:13 -0400, Marc Schneiderman wrote:
So, I believe what they were writing about in the 1950s was more
correct than what we're teaching today with respect to sugar and diet.
And, we will not have less obese kids until we remove the
cereal/starch/fries/goldfish/etc. from their diets.
NO, NO, NO!! NOT THE GOLDFISH!
He means the little crackers. It is still perfectly acceptable to
swallow a goldfish in a glass of beer...
--
Joe - Registered Linux User #449481
So... does this mean I have to leave?
Smokin' Travis
~Not a goldfish, just a little crackers.
.
- References:
- Re: Cigar tax defeated
- From: JtN©
- Re: Cigar tax defeated
- From: Bart Goddard
- Re: Cigar tax defeated
- From: Marc Schneiderman
- Re: Cigar tax defeated
- From: Alex W.
- Re: Cigar tax defeated
- From: Miss Elaine Eos
- Re: Cigar tax defeated
- From: Marc Schneiderman
- Re: Cigar tax defeated
- From: Michael Barrett
- Re: Cigar tax defeated
- From: Marc Schneiderman
- Re: Cigar tax defeated
- From: Winston Castro
- Re: Cigar tax defeated
- From: Marc Schneiderman
- Re: Cigar tax defeated
- From: Demonick
- Re: Cigar tax defeated
- From: Joe
- Re: Cigar tax defeated
- Prev by Date: Re: OT:Way to go Al
- Next by Date: Re: ASC FAQ REMINDER
- Previous by thread: Re: Cigar tax defeated
- Next by thread: Re: Cigar tax defeated
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|