Re: political
- From: "btorvik2" <btorvik2@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 10:36:35 -0500
Bart Goddard wrote:
Miss Elaine Eos <Misc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in news:Misc-
7477C1.22315905092007@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
Perhaps you could suggest a test that I could apply to any evidence
that someone gave me for a particular argument, and thereby
determine if said evidence was objective or subjective.
As I said to Alex, objective is external, subjective is internal.
The argument that God exists because I feel Him inside my heart
is subjective.
The argument that God exists because I saw a bush burning without
being consumed, a guy raised from the dead, fire fall from heaven,
etc. is external to me.
Only I can feel what's in my heart. But anyone who happened to
be standing around would see the fire fall from heaven.
B.
So bible accounts of the events you mentioned would be considered objective
evidence just as history books would be about people like Attila the Hun.
The difference would be your acceptance level of the validity of the
objective evidence.
bernie
--
"Official ASC Shaman"
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: political
- From: Bart Goddard
- Re: political
- References:
- Re: political
- From: Bart Goddard
- Re: political
- From: Marc Schneiderman
- Re: political
- From: Miss Elaine Eos
- Re: political
- From: Alex W.
- Re: political
- From: Bart Goddard
- Re: political
- From: Marc Schneiderman
- Re: political
- From: Bart Goddard
- Re: political
- From: Alex W.
- Re: political
- From: Bart Goddard
- Re: political
- From: Miss Elaine Eos
- Re: political
- From: Bart Goddard
- Re: political
- From: Miss Elaine Eos
- Re: political
- From: Bart Goddard
- Re: political
- From: Winston Castro
- Re: political
- From: Bart Goddard
- Re: political
- From: Miss Elaine Eos
- Re: political
- From: Bart Goddard
- Re: political
- Prev by Date: Re: Nuclear OOPS!
- Next by Date: Re: political
- Previous by thread: Re: political
- Next by thread: Re: political
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|