Re: Intro

On Sep 6, 9:35 am, "btorvik2" <btorv...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
SINNER wrote:
* Demonick wrote in alt.smokers.cigars:

On Tue, 04 Sep 2007 00:14:12 GMT, SINNER wrote:

* MikeZ wrote in alt.smokers.cigars:
On Sep 3, 9:30 am, Marc Schneiderman <garba...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, 02 Sep 2007 14:08:40 -0500, Mickey

<Mic...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Marc Schneiderman <garba...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Sat, 01 Sep 2007 13:17:21 -0500, Mickey
<Mic...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Oh, yes, that. I forgot to mention that, like many closeted
homosexuals, Gladys goes around accusing everyone who doesn't
take him seriously of being gay.

I agree. Oh, BTW Mickey, weren't we gonna have dinner together?
:-) ThigarBaron

I think we're slated for something in November. ;-)

Did you change the curtains yet or are we going shopping?

You post as if you're proud of being gay. Do you also advocate
being gay as well as breaking US Law?

Now youve done and gone over the edge. Being Gay is not illegal
contrary to what Bush would have us believe.

I do not recall Bush ever stating being gay is or should be illegal.
In fact, I do not recall a single disparaging word from Bush on gays.

Then you've turned a blind eye.

Not allowing 'them' to get married is disparageing, it is treating
'them' as second citizens, in fact any law that causes Gay's to be
treated any differently than anyones else is simply unacceptable.

We all have the same rights in this country regardless or Race, Color,
Creed or sexual orientation. If he said Blacks cant legally be married
that is in no way different. People dont decide to become gay just
like they dont decide to be black.

And giving certain privileges to "marriage" can be discriminatory to single
people.

bernie

--
"Official ASC Shaman"- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Thank you for that but the over educated among us can't grasp the
simplicity of seeing both sides of an issue. To justify spending all
that time and other peoples money they have an overwhelming need to
give it three or four or more sides.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Conservative Judaism and gay marriage
    ...  It  would be better to have the exact text of the law rather ... clergy is about *doing* a wedding, not doing a reception. ... easily have been a lawsuit before gay marriage was legalized because ... ***That doesn' tmean the suits will affect Jews. ...
    (soc.culture.jewish.moderated)
  • Re: Can marriage be saved?
    ... A few have the gay bee in their bonnets, ... Law enforcement needs prodding. ... No, I am not defending extreme behavior, but I am pointing out that there is more going on in Virginia than meets the eye and that behavior, manifested by blatant discrimination against homosexuals is indefensible. ... VIRGINIA SHOULD REMOVE ITS UNCONSTITUTIONAL SODOMY LAW FROM THE CRIMINAL CODE ...
    (soc.retirement)
  • Re: same sex regulations - discrimination against Christians?
    ... about the bogeyman prospect of gay rights groups ... requiring Christian printers to print their propaganda:] ... I don't think aiding them is something the law should aim at, ... printer to avoid getting business of a sort they'd object to. ...
    (uk.religion.christian)
  • Fags In The News - Pope Criticizes Special Laws for Fags, Bull Dykes and Mutants
    ... Pope Criticizes Special Laws for Gays ... Human rights campaigner and gay activist Peter Tatchell said he saw ... But he added that "the effect of some of the legislation designed to ... "In some respects it actually violates the natural law upon which the ...
    (alt.politics)