Re: Cuban (?) box code
- From: "btorvik2" <btorvik2@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 08:47:50 -0500
Winston Castro wrote:
On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 03:55:13 GMT, Hutch <champboat@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 02:57:54 GMT, at7000@xxxxxxxxxxx (Winston Castro)
wrote:
(Loosely packed tobacco smokes quicker for me)
Uhhhhhhhh...pretty much everybody else too :)
What I meant to say, is that I think Cuban tobacco actually burns
differently, slightly slower. And Cuban cigars are packed more densely
with tobacco. This is part of the reason that they are so good IMO.
They generally can pack lots more flavor and smoke slower.
I actually prefer cigars that have a slightly firm draw to them. As
opposed to being rolled too loosely.
If you can keep them lit. :-)
bernie
--
"Official ASC Shaman"
.
- References:
- Cuban (?) box code
- From: Ken Dixon
- Re: Cuban (?) box code
- From: Hutch
- Re: Cuban (?) box code
- From: Ken Dixon
- Re: Cuban (?) box code
- From: T.I.
- Re: Cuban (?) box code
- From: Hutch
- Re: Cuban (?) box code
- From: T.I.
- Re: Cuban (?) box code
- From: Hutch
- Re: Cuban (?) box code
- From: Skyhawk XP
- Re: Cuban (?) box code
- From: Winston Castro
- Re: Cuban (?) box code
- From: Hutch
- Re: Cuban (?) box code
- From: Winston Castro
- Cuban (?) box code
- Prev by Date: Re: Intro
- Next by Date: Re: political
- Previous by thread: Re: Cuban (?) box code
- Next by thread: Re: Cuban (?) box code
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|