Re: Cuban (?) box code
- From: Hutch <champboat@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 15:37:44 GMT
On Thu, 30 Aug 2007 11:06:17 -0400, "Tim J."
<NOkpos3wtSPAM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Alex W. typed:
"T.I." <titanl9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:hz5awynh1cpd$.18i5xvqzilgva.dlg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 29 Aug 2007 16:38:39 GMT, Hutch wrote:
Ummmmmmmm...what is this "allotted time" ?
More then 45 mins smoking a fine cigar, and I start thinking "I don't
want to leave any behind" but, they are to expensive to waste - ;-) so
I've reached 1h 15mins with churchills.
75 minutes is *way* too fast for a churchill -- that's about the
right time to spend on a robusto!
People who smoke that fast usually find many cigars to be harsh. When I find
myself with time contraints, I'd rather smoke a third of the cigar than rush
it.
Same here. My goal is to enjoy the cigar, not "finish" it. I'll
generally choose a cigar that better fits the time allotted, or just
not smoke one, if time is short. Fortunately there are cigars that I
stock that fit times of from 20min to 2.5 hours.
--
"I really think cigar smoking does make you smarter."
P.J. O'Rourke
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Cuban (?) box code
- From: T.I.
- Re: Cuban (?) box code
- From: Tim J.
- Re: Cuban (?) box code
- References:
- Cuban (?) box code
- From: Ken Dixon
- Re: Cuban (?) box code
- From: Hutch
- Re: Cuban (?) box code
- From: Ken Dixon
- Re: Cuban (?) box code
- From: T.I.
- Re: Cuban (?) box code
- From: Hutch
- Re: Cuban (?) box code
- From: T.I.
- Re: Cuban (?) box code
- From: Alex W.
- Re: Cuban (?) box code
- From: Tim J.
- Cuban (?) box code
- Prev by Date: Re: Cuban (?) box code
- Next by Date: Re: Cuban (?) box code
- Previous by thread: Re: Cuban (?) box code
- Next by thread: Re: Cuban (?) box code
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
