Re: Sandy Springs, "private" community
- From: "skippy" <shleprock1492@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 02:40:26 GMT
"Mickey" <Mickey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:8qpna39ie7aqmg4bopa8fhrenn1dhh3c7p@xxxxxxxxxx
MikeZ <Mike.Gets.His@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jul 28, 5:35 pm, Mickey <Mic...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
MikeZ <Mike.Gets....@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Your friend may be correct if he used ASC as an example. Look what's
happen to it since you few have tried to privatize this newsgroup.
It's threads like this that will help take it further down the tubes.
First of all, ASC is a usenet newsgroup, not a town or city.
Second of all, *YOU* are the one who has tried to privatize the
newsgroup.
All you do is make impotent threats and lie.
Yeah whatever. You're one of the few that's taking it down the tubes.
Additionally, "Yeah whatever." indicates that you concur, and that I
am correct. That you are trying to "privatize" this newsgroup.
ASC is not going down the tubes. You are wrong about that.
How you holding up in all the rain, I can see ya didnt get flooded out yet.
:))
Rick
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Sandy Springs, "private" community
- From: Mickey
- Re: Sandy Springs, "private" community
- References:
- [OT] Sandy Springs, "private" community
- From: Miss Elaine Eos
- Re: [OT] Sandy Springs, "private" community
- From: Alex W.
- Re: [OT] Sandy Springs, "private" community
- From: Miss Elaine Eos
- Re: Sandy Springs, "private" community
- From: MikeZ
- Re: Sandy Springs, "private" community
- From: Mickey
- Re: Sandy Springs, "private" community
- From: MikeZ
- Re: Sandy Springs, "private" community
- From: Mickey
- [OT] Sandy Springs, "private" community
- Prev by Date: Re: political
- Next by Date: Re: political
- Previous by thread: Re: Sandy Springs, "private" community
- Next by thread: Re: Sandy Springs, "private" community
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|