Re: Sandy Springs, "private" community
- From: MikeZ <Mike.Gets.His@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 21:10:31 -0700
On Jul 28, 8:13 pm, Mickey <Mic...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
MikeZ <Mike.Gets....@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jul 28, 5:35 pm, Mickey <Mic...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
MikeZ <Mike.Gets....@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Your friend may be correct if he used ASC as an example. Look what's
happen to it since you few have tried to privatize this newsgroup.
It's threads like this that will help take it further down the tubes.
First of all, ASC is a usenet newsgroup, not a town or city.
Second of all, *YOU* are the one who has tried to privatize the
newsgroup.
All you do is make impotent threats and lie.
Yeah whatever. You're one of the few that's taking it down the tubes.
Additionally, "Yeah whatever." indicates that you concur, and that I
am correct. That you are trying to "privatize" this newsgroup.
ASC is not going down the tubes. You are wrong about that.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Yeah whatever wat a reply to your name calling and I never said I's
call anyone related to this newgroup. It's not me who's trying to
privatize ASC it's people like you who are doing that filling it with
off-topic threads and it is taking it down the tubes.
.
- References:
- [OT] Sandy Springs, "private" community
- From: Miss Elaine Eos
- Re: [OT] Sandy Springs, "private" community
- From: Alex W.
- Re: [OT] Sandy Springs, "private" community
- From: Miss Elaine Eos
- Re: Sandy Springs, "private" community
- From: MikeZ
- Re: Sandy Springs, "private" community
- From: Mickey
- Re: Sandy Springs, "private" community
- From: MikeZ
- Re: Sandy Springs, "private" community
- From: Mickey
- [OT] Sandy Springs, "private" community
- Prev by Date: Re: [OT] Sandy Springs, "private" community
- Next by Date: Re: [OT] Sandy Springs, "private" community
- Previous by thread: Re: Sandy Springs, "private" community
- Next by thread: Re: Sandy Springs, "private" community
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|