Re: Review: La Aurora Independencia
- From: Marc Schneiderman <garbaron@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 16:04:41 -0500
On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 19:06:41 GMT, "MLF" <fermanis@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<demonick@xxxxxxxxx> wrote
I think the 1495 will improve with some age. Nothing could improve the
Independencia. Now I know for a fact CA ratings are bogus.
In fact, a poster did a survey over a year or two
and determined that the more ad space the company bought, the higher their
cigars rated.
Actually that poster found no correlation between ratings and producer
advertisements. I don't have the original post but it did suprise me.
However it's seems like the Fuente's are always given some
preferential treatment by Marvin et al.
CigarBaron
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Review: La Aurora Independencia
- From: JamesE
- Re: Review: La Aurora Independencia
- References:
- Review: La Aurora Independencia
- From: demonick
- Re: Review: La Aurora Independencia
- From: TimL
- Re: Review: La Aurora Independencia
- From: demonick
- Re: Review: La Aurora Independencia
- From: MLF
- Review: La Aurora Independencia
- Prev by Date: Re: Open ASC for all who care
- Next by Date: Re: Spring's sprung
- Previous by thread: Re: Review: La Aurora Independencia
- Next by thread: Re: Review: La Aurora Independencia
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading