Re: Alberto Gonzales has your back:

the justices."
>
> http://www.bsos.umd.edu/gvpt/lpbr/subpages/reviews/Glenn404.htm
>
> I have also concluded that this idea of "privacy" is completely open
> to interpretation. Like so much of the New Testament. I have very
> little use for either.

(emphasis added)

"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and
effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall NOT be violated,
and NO Warrants shall issue, but upon PROBABLE CAUSE, supported by Oath or
affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the
persons or things to be seized." -- Fourth Amendment of the Constitution

---

Interpret that.


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: OT: Time To Buy A Gun, Or Move To New Zealand?
    ... >>Compare and contrast this to the right of privacy, ... > Second Amendment limits the possession of arms to the militia and I ... > that the consistent interpretation by the United States Supreme Court ... > right by the citizenry, militia and non-militia, to bear arms. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Several pages of calendar need translation
    ... It seems to me I heard somewhere that Ben Bullock wrote in article ... give me an interpretation so that I can compare with one I received ... company or something which will respect your privacy? ...
    (sci.lang.japan)
  • Re: Outside of an honest attempt
    ... right to privacy might have meant that they saw particular types of privacy as rights and not ... They had no idea how perverted the interpretation of the BoR ...
    (rec.sport.football.college)