Re: OT: I'm angry


Lee wrote:
> How in the name of God can the administration (and I would say this of ANY
> administration), let our children die of dehydration in the streets of New
> Orleans? They manage to mobilize $180 million a day worth of military in
> Iraq, yet the government can't get its act together in one of our own cities
> to provide even drinkable water. I just don't understand it. And I can't
> watch many more news coverage -- it's just too sad. Unbelievable.

Krugman put it very well today:




Before 9/11 the Federal Emergency Management Agency listed the three
most likely catastrophic disasters facing America: a terrorist attack
on New York, a major earthquake in San Francisco and a hurricane strike
on New Orleans. "The New Orleans hurricane scenario," The Houston
Chronicle wrote in December 2001, "may be the deadliest of all." It
described a potential catastrophe very much like the one now happening.

So why were New Orleans and the nation so unprepared? After 9/11, hard
questions were deferred in the name of national unity, then buried
under a thick coat of whitewash. This time, we need accountability.

First question: Why have aid and security taken so long to arrive?
Katrina hit five days ago - and it was already clear by last Friday
that Katrina could do immense damage along the Gulf Coast. Yet the
response you'd expect from an advanced country never happened.
Thousands of Americans are dead or dying, not because they refused to
evacuate, but because they were too poor or too sick to get out without
help - and help wasn't provided. Many have yet to receive any help at
all.

There will and should be many questions about the response of state and
local governments; in particular, couldn't they have done more to help
the poor and sick escape? But the evidence points, above all, to a
stunning lack of both preparation and urgency in the federal
government's response.



Even military resources in the right place weren't ordered into action.
"On Wednesday," said an editorial in The Sun Herald in Biloxi, Miss.,
"reporters listening to horrific stories of death and survival at the
Biloxi Junior High School shelter looked north across Irish Hill Road
and saw Air Force personnel playing basketball and performing
calisthenics. Playing basketball and performing calisthenics!"

Maybe administration officials believed that the local National Guard
could keep order and deliver relief. But many members of the National
Guard and much of its equipment - including high-water vehicles - are
in Iraq. "The National Guard needs that equipment back home to support
the homeland security mission," a Louisiana Guard officer told
reporters several weeks ago.

Second question: Why wasn't more preventive action taken? After 2003
the Army Corps of Engineers sharply slowed its flood-control work,
including work on sinking levees. "The corps," an Editor and Publisher
article says, citing a series of articles in The Times-Picayune in New
Orleans, "never tried to hide the fact that the spending pressures of
the war in Iraq, as well as homeland security - coming at the same time
as federal tax cuts - was the reason for the strain."

In 2002 the corps' chief resigned, reportedly under threat of being
fired, after he criticized the administration's proposed cuts in the
corps' budget, including flood-control spending.

Third question: Did the Bush administration destroy FEMA's
effectiveness? The administration has, by all accounts, treated the
emergency management agency like an unwanted stepchild, leading to a
mass exodus of experienced professionals.

Last year James Lee Witt, who won bipartisan praise for his leadership
of the agency during the Clinton years, said at a Congressional
hearing: "I am extremely concerned that the ability of our nation to
prepare for and respond to disasters has been sharply eroded. I hear
from emergency managers, local and state leaders, and first responders
nearly every day that the FEMA they knew and worked well with has now
disappeared."

I don't think this is a simple tale of incompetence. The reason the
military wasn't rushed in to help along the Gulf Coast is, I believe,
the same reason nothing was done to stop looting after the fall of
Baghdad. Flood control was neglected for the same reason our troops in
Iraq didn't get adequate armor.

At a fundamental level, I'd argue, our current leaders just aren't
serious about some of the essential functions of government. They like
waging war, but they don't like providing security, rescuing those in
need or spending on preventive measures. And they never, ever ask for
shared sacrifice.

Yesterday Mr. Bush made an utterly fantastic claim: that nobody
expected the breach of the levees. In fact, there had been repeated
warnings about exactly that risk.

So America, once famous for its can-do attitude, now has a can't-do
government that makes excuses instead of doing its job. And while it
makes those excuses, Americans are dying.

E-mail: krugman@xxxxxxxxxxx

Copyright 2005 The New York Times Company

Reprinted from The New York Times:
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/02/opinion/02krugman.html

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: It is still Friday and Huh? Welfare for Jidhadist
    ... The Obama Administration is the "gift that just keeps on giving." ... Beyond that, as elucidated in my writing, I believe alien enemy combatants should be detained at Guantanamo Bay until the conclusion of hostilities. ... The President did this even though he and you agree Gitmo is a top-flight prison facility, acknowledge that our nation is still at war, and concede that many Gitmo detainees are extremely dangerous terrorists who cannot be tried under civilian court rules. ...
    (rec.martial-arts)
  • Re: "No One Can Say they Didnt See it Coming"
    ... > striking New Orleans was one of the three most likely disasters in the ... > Orleans could be protected from a catastrophic hurricane, but the Bush ... > administration ordered that the research not be undertaken. ... > issued its first comprehensive "Report on the Environment," stating, ...
    (rec.music.country.western)
  • Let The Finger Pointing Begin
    ... FEMA warned that a hurricane striking New Orleans was one of the ... three most likely disasters in the U.S. But the Bush administration cut New ... Orleans flood control funding by 44 percent to pay for the Iraq war. ... Orleans could be protected from a catastrophic hurricane, but the Bush ...
    (soc.senior.issues)
  • Bush, AIDS, 911 and Katrina
    ... cut New Orleans flood control funding by 44% to pay for the Iraq war. ... Biblical in its uncontrolled rage and scope, Hurricane Katrina has left ... Orleans could be protected from a catastrophic hurricane, but the Bush ... administration ordered that the research not be undertaken. ...
    (misc.invest.stocks)
  • Re: No More Treasuries
    ... discipline similar to that of the current administration. ... stands to reason that the first few programs that are put into place will ... counterinformation that was available to Bush has now come ... but the opposite of democratic liberalism is not fascism -- it's ...
    (soc.retirement)
Loading