Re: Advertising
- From: IMS <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 07:50:17 -0500
On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 02:26:54 -0800, Samantha Hill - take out TRASH to
reply <fleetfingers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
IMS wrote:
On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 19:49:19 -0800, Samantha Hill - take out TRASH to
reply <fleetfingers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
This is an unmoderated Usenet newsgroup, and there is no real way of
prohibiting anything.
Usenet is also not an advertising medium. Google "Advertising on
Usenet" and you'll see very similar documents. Here is just one.
Very true -- HOWEVER, the original question was, "do we discourage ads?"
and the correct answer to that question is that there is no effective
way to do that.
True but the comment I was referring to was, "This is an unmoderated
Usenet newsgroup, and there is no real way of prohibiting anything."
Encouraging offenders to read the rules of netettique, reporting
spammers and replying to ads (while at the same time removing the
links included in them) requesting the poster understand Usenet, is
actually, very effective. It's why this and some other groups are not
innundated with ads.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Advertising
- From: Pogonip
- Re: Advertising
- References:
- Advertising
- From: Pat in Arkansas
- Re: Advertising
- From: Samantha Hill - take out TRASH to reply
- Re: Advertising
- From: IMS
- Re: Advertising
- From: Samantha Hill - take out TRASH to reply
- Advertising
- Prev by Date: FTL sewing! (Was: You know how we always say... Progress report!)
- Next by Date: update on potential sewing job that I *think* I mentioned a while back
- Previous by thread: Re: Advertising
- Next by thread: Re: Advertising
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
