Re: Dear "Well Known National Alarm Company":

Frank Olson wrote:
Frank Olson wrote:

Considering the occupancy, I'd say as far as is necessary to achieve the maximum benefit. In this case two separate technologies will be used. A hard line (POTS) and GSM.


As far back as the manhole from the street ?

Either end of the building/structure.

Actually this applies to the central station, not the monitored premises... My bad. Be that as it may, I've always been nervous employing a dual line communicator. I've seen "hatchet jobs" on more than one main incoming drop.
right, next you'll be saying you flew upside down while selling insurance. ;)
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Dear "Well Known National Alarm Company":
    ... In this case two separate technologies will be used. ... A hard line (POTS) and GSM. ... Actually this applies to the central station, ...
    (alt.security.alarms)
  • Re: Dear "Well Known National Alarm Company":
    ... In this case two separate technologies will be used. ... A hard line (POTS) and GSM. ... Actually this applies to the central station, ...
    (alt.security.alarms)
  • Re: AlarmNet reliability how can it go down with no notice?
    ... Is there any Honeywell GSM product that will be taking the place of the ... Your security company also sets the frequency of the test reports to the ... Companies is such that left in its current state, the demise of POTS is ... off-hook phone stops communication or at least slows it down assuming the ...
    (alt.security.alarms)
  • Re: 2way
    ... This widget can be set up to communicate securely & supervised over ... POTS, GSM and/or Ethernet; http://www.interopix.com/roc_controller.php ...
    (alt.security.alarms)