Re: Brinks v Jim Rojas New Motion

Wonder if they know what/who Nomen Nescio even is - actually they should
right?





--
Crash Gordon
-------ouch------

<I feel like I'm diagonally parked in a parallel universe>
"Nomen Nescio" <nobody@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:974cbe429c4a0d0a946142b19d261dc5@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| You just don't seem to get it, Jim. Every word you write here will be
| quoted back to the judge in an attempt to make you look bad. The more
crap
| you sling at Brink's, the worse it will make you look. If you're going to
| piss people off, at least wait until after a judgment is entered against
| you.
|
| You're playing a game of poker, only you think you're playing blackjack.
| The judge doesn't care what you write here, except insofar as it makes you
| look like a bad person. She doesn't read this newsgroup. She only reads
| what people put in the motions they send her. You're not sending her any,
| so she's only reading Brink's side of the story. That's your fault, not
| Sableman's. It's not his job to present a fair and balanced view of
| things. It's his job to represent Brink's.
|
| You're in the fix you're in because you didn't answer the lawsuit when you
| were supposed to. The judge has given you an opportunity to make one last
| legal challenge before you get hammered, and you are apparently wasting
it.
|
| In short, Brink's is following the rules of the litigation game, and you
| are not. All the bitching and moaning here and on your website won't
| change the outcome. You have about one week left to file a good legal
| argument with the court on why a Texas court doesn't have the authority to
| enter a judgment against you. Don't blow the opportunity. See if you can
| hire a lawyer for the limited purpose of preparing this motion; he doesn't
| have to represent you for the entire case. The money you spend on lawyers
| now is money Brink's can't take away from you later.
|
| For the benefit of the Brink's lawyers who are reading this: there are
| multiple Nomen Nescios posting messages here. This one, I assure you, is
| not Jim Rojas posting under an alias, and your assertions that Jim is
| posting under aliases are not only without foundation, they border on the
| ridiculous.
|
| Let's see you quote that to the judge.
|


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Brinks v Jim Rojas New Motion
    ... You just don't seem to get it, Jim. ... The judge doesn't care what you write here, except insofar as it makes you ... For the benefit of the Brink's lawyers who are reading this: ... multiple Nomen Nescios posting messages here. ...
    (alt.security.alarms)
  • Re: Every once in a while, McCain shows hes pretty smrat
    ... lecturer in Senator Obama than it did the guy who can get things done. ... they sound like an activist judge wrote them. ... lawyers, and law professors who think they know wisdom when they see ... \ Rich Hammett http://home.hiwaay.net/~rhammett ...
    (rec.sport.football.college)
  • Expertize, forensic and not
    ... Lawyers dictinary is available on line and in any manual. ... He can testify if asked by any: Judge or prosecutor with Judge ... This evidence is treated as forensic if Judge evaluated it and takes ... ready for court qualification as lawyers on all sides and judge are ...
    (soc.culture.usa)
  • Shalom - scott gilbert.jpg (0/1)
    ... I have to meet with lawyers tuesday to sign a final agreement to be ... presented to the judge. ... I pay unallocated funds of $2,100 per week. ... I get the children for all Jewish holidays and two American holidays. ...
    (soc.culture.israel)
  • Judge sees slowdown in case of second Browns defendant
    ... The judge in the Brown's Chicken murder trial accused lawyers Friday ... James Degorski, 34, appeared before Cook County Circuit Judge Vincent ... Gaughan the day after after his co-defendant and former Fremd High ...
    (alt.true-crime)