Re: SurGard MLR2000


"Signalman1968" <signalman1968@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1151632332.601866.302680@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Mark Leuck wrote:


Your friend must work for ADT then, those receivers are $100,000 each

Well, was it hard to guess? lol

I'm trying to understand then why you are asking about it?

I'm not surprised and it has nothing to do with Tyco, the fact is that
is a
receiver with an extremely limited audience.

Yea, I agree with you there, my only issue is that DSC, and now along
with Tyco, has cut the original staff of SurGard that there isn't many
of them left that even know any of their receivers.

I only deal with 2 people there, Sasha and Mike Rappos. I dont know anyone
else there



But the SG-III is a platform to improve on, the SG-2000 is a dead-end
road
technology-wise. Also the SG-III adds Internet monitoring which can't be
done on the 2000



Again, another point to agree upon, however there are several issues in
the works as of right now that we have discovered with the SGIII that
we have themn working on. The bugs of that receiver have definately not
been worked out as of yet. But the size and price of the design is more
industry friendly than what the 2k is for sure. I am still totally
amazed how a company can produce a rcvr with the quality of workmanship
of the MLR2, and then put out a unit as of the tin box of the 2K.

SurGard has a habit of releasing amazing promising products then don't
deliver, the 2k was supposed to do a ton of other things except they never
got around to implementing them. It took them a while to get the bugs out of
the 2k


60 line cabinets and DNIS

Great, glad to hear others are using DNIS also, I have ran into others
that only use it for line to line, therefore limiting quite a few
features of the 2k.

We use DNIS from in house switch, then each unit is set to multiple
platforms here.



.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: SurGard MLR2000
    ... of them left that even know any of their receivers. ... But the SG-III is a platform to improve on, ... Great, glad to hear others are using DNIS also, I have ran into others ...
    (alt.security.alarms)
  • Re: Authentication failed suddenly
    ... >> off on such a platform, ... the developers don't consider it a fundamental part of the distribution. ... >The bugs are platform compatibility bugs. ... bugs and report them - rather than rambling in public fora ...
    (comp.security.ssh)
  • Re: Writing portable applications
    ... > previously stated, Sturgeon's law applies to the web, so chances are ... > The only difference is that the user of Platform 54 has a chance to ... it may not work because that platforms bugs are ... >> vendor refuses to fix a bug and ask THEM to ask that vendor. ...
    (comp.unix.programmer)
  • Re: [RFC, Announce] Unified x86 architecture, arch/x86
    ... have a nice style that you like and think that it is cleaner. ... It's not really the same platform: one is PC hardware going back forever ... with zillions of bugs, the other is modern PC platforms which much less ... That was not the point of this patch. ...
    (Linux-Kernel)
  • Re: Writing portable applications
    ... >> interfaces. ... > But as soon as some user of platform 54 tries your website, ... it may not work because that platforms bugs are ... > tons of inter-application traffic in XML already, ...
    (comp.unix.programmer)