Re: SurGard MLR2000



Yea, well I totally understand what you are saying there.
Unfortunately, (as you can tell I changed my profile on here) let's
just say I have a friend that is a proud owner of 35 of these units. :)
The features of this receiver far out do the quality of the design. I
am just really surprised that after DSC had bought out SurGard, then
Tyco taking over DSC, that they are phasing out the receiver in the way
that they are. Now the SystemIII, even though operates the same
protocol and software version that the MLR2000 does, is still limited
in two properity versions that the MLR2000 however handles, therefore
limiting the capabilites of some of SurGard's current customers.

Just wondering about the other guys, you stated that you have 4 units
installed. Are you using 60 line units, or 255 unit cabinet sets? DNIS
or POTS lines?

Would like to tech chat further on this if you wished.

Signalman...


Mark Leuck wrote:
"Signalman" <itadtmsm@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1151525146.459643.265670@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I was just checking the boards and seen to where some comments were
being discussed in regards to the SurGard's MLR2000 back in Sept of
2005. Was wondering if there was anyone in this group that was still
working with these and wanting to do some cross discussion on this
subject.

Was also wondering what their thoughts were on the company's statement
this month of the receiver being discontinued.

Signalman

We have 4 of them and they are awsome however they have always had limited
market potential compared to the SGIII, they are extremely expensive and
there is only a limited number of central stations that could afford one or
use it to its capacity which is about a million accounts.

Also the brain is a Pentium I which is long discontinued so they had an
obsolete platform that would have been far too expensive for SurGard to
update

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: DSC 632 - Using both 900Mhz and 433Mhz sensors
    ... >> So are we sure the Street Smart key fob kit would not interfere with my ... >> DSC keypad with built in 900 MHz receiver? ...
    (alt.security.alarms)
  • Re: DSC 632 - Using both 900Mhz and 433Mhz sensors
    ... I have a DSC 632 system with several 900Mhz ... >> sensors and a keypad with built in 900Mhz receiver. ... >> Receiver) supports it's own zones. ...
    (alt.security.alarms)
  • Re: DSC 632 - Using both 900Mhz and 433Mhz sensors
    ... I have a DSC 632 system with several 900Mhz ... > sensors and a keypad with built in 900Mhz receiver. ... > Receiver) supports it's own zones. ...
    (alt.security.alarms)
  • Re: DSC 632 - Using both 900Mhz and 433Mhz sensors
    ... Since DSC now switched to 433Mhz is it possible to add a 433Mhz antenna/receiver to the system to allow use of 900 and 433 based sensors? ... I would assume this would be ok since the 433Mhz receiver supports it's own zones. ... you can search eBay or http://www.tech-man.com for any additional units you might require. ...
    (alt.security.alarms)
  • Re: Is it possible to create a patch or update an Excel Program?
    ... Gary's Student, ... Would the receiver of this new file have to copy and paste his data ... securityman's Profile: http://www.excelforum.com/member.php?action=getinfo&userid=8829 ... Prev by Date: ...
    (microsoft.public.excel.programming)