Re: Take Over Practices

How so ? I don't see anything in it relating to gender which might make it
"sexist". I figured it would get some people going based on the content, but
never based on it being a "sexist" remark.

Maybe I'm too "old school" to understand; maybe you young guys could explain
how its sexist....

RHC

"mikey" <loismustdie@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:4454f25f$0$14454$88260bb3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Yep, I concur... it was a sexist post, Bob.

"R.H.Campbell" <rh.campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:nf25g.41$ix6.8806@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sexist ???!!! I've been called a lot of things, but never sexist before.
But
you're right, if the equipment is leased, they can do what they want with
it. I understood (it seems incorrectly) that Brinks sold their
hardware...

But sexist.....???

RHC

"Doug L" <vssdoug@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:ibX4g.15296$Qz.1732@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
I find your rant somewhat sexist, but leaving that aside I didn't think
that Brinks actually sold their proprietary panels, I was under the
impression that they leased the equipment with Brinks retaining
ownership
in which case Brinks has every right to retain complete control and
freedom
of choice of their equipment at the end of the term without having to
worry
about the bottom feeders stealing their equipment for their own use.

Doug L

--

"R.H.Campbell" <rh.campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:uAW4g.2873$1V4.226223@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Rant "ON"..

Where the hell are the discussions and concerns about the customers
rights in all this !! What right does Brinks have to sell a
proprietary
panel to a customer that doesn't allow the customer complete control
and
freedom of choice over HIS equipment at the end of the term ?
Answer...they don't !!






*** Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com ***


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Take Over Practices
    ... you said HIS equipment and Doug caught you fair and sqaure. ... impression that they leased the equipment with Brinks retaining ... in which case Brinks has every right to retain complete control and ... panel to a customer that doesn't allow the customer complete ...
    (alt.security.alarms)
  • Re: Brinks v Rojas Update Request
    ... How many times has anyone gone to a Brinks job and found ... misapplication of products, poor customer service, on and on. ... ADT etc. as the pariahs to the industry they truly deserve to be ... sales effort for many an alarm company. ...
    (alt.security.alarms)
  • Re: Brinks Home Security Pays Off The Better Business Bureau
    ... A company as large as Brinks resorting to taking on authorized dealers must be in a huge financial worry. ... Why should the dealer then be held responsible for the customer paying for whatever time limit Brinks sets? ... Then by contract the dealer is forbidden to salvage the deal or even take the customer back and keep it an in house account. ...
    (alt.security.alarms)
  • Re: Take Over Practices
    ... OK I'll argue with you. ... impression that they leased the equipment with Brinks retaining ... in which case Brinks has every right to retain complete control and ... panel to a customer that doesn't allow the customer complete ...
    (alt.security.alarms)
  • Re: Brinks Home Security Pays Off The Better Business Bureau
    ... Jim Rojas wrote: ... Why should the dealer then be held responsible for the customer paying for whatever time limit Brinks sets? ...
    (alt.security.alarms)