Re: Power Supply

Jimmy and Joe were pretty thorough, but it ended there.Maybe it was me
but it seemed like the only thing that mattered was the course fee. It
had a very 'hokey' feel to it. I'd be interested in learning more about
your courses so please email me the details.
Thanks
Tom

Mike Sokoly wrote:
No, I don't Teach Robert P's Course- I'm his competition!
I took my class from them- I konow Allan very well, as well as Jimmy and
Sal and of course Mr. P! I was asked to instruct with them, did a few
classes but when it came to remuneration- Robert told me I was "Just a
Trainee". Sooo being Hungarian I don't get mad- I get even. Now HE calls
my Boss asking if we have any extra students to send him - to which we
reply , sorry - SEND US SOME OF YOURS- Too bad for him. BTW ALL OUR
INSTRUCTORS teach other certified electrician traing classes- MAster
Prep, Apprentice and the like: We are ALL NY STATE Education Department
Permanent Teachers- he and his clan are NOT- the can only teach the one
60HR Security Course!



Mr.Double-sided tape wrote:
Why would he bother himself with knowledge when his good ole boys
network appointment to that position only calls for him to make *** up
as he goes along?
Think about this, you're licensed to install fire, as well as certified
to teach fire installers, but your certifications mean diddly *** once
you hit the 5 boroughs unless you're willing to give Local 3 a taste.
How screwy is that?

You teach Bobby P's course? If you do then we crossed paths before.
Jimmy Mac, and Joe from Napco were great, but Glasser would put a
cokehead to sleep with his stories
:-)


Mike Sokoly wrote:

I asked him if he followed NFPA 72 and 70 -his reply was NO! I only
follow NY State Residential Code _"I've been doing this for 10 years'!
"Not very well- appparently and IVE been doing it MORE."
I said - so you mean to tell me that Your Town Doesn't adopt the NFPA 72
and 70- REPLY:"I don'tKnow _I don't have a copy. Talk to my boss"
What an ***!
I pissed him off when I mentioned I'm a NYS License Instructor- he got
all flustered and huffy.
Mr.Double-sided tape wrote:

If the inspector is of Long Island origin then throw him a few bucks.
They are all on the take out there :-)

Try to make heads or tails from this one.
An insurance company required a resi customer to install a motion, and
smoke in EVERY room while under construction, and then after
construction they wanted a heat in EVERY room. The guy has a 6 level
brownstone, including basement, and sub-basement. The entire house was
gutted (No windows installed at that time, and no plywood covering the
opening) but the insurance company calls for motions. Can you say false
alarm magnet? How about smokes in a dusty enviroment? And what the hell
are they thinking calling for replacement of the smokes with heats
AFTER construction?


Mike Sokoly wrote:


Here's a funny one.
Town of Huntington, NY can waive the installation of 120V interconnected
smoke detectors if a listed control panel with fire capability is
installed in a residential occupancy. The kick is the building inspector
says that Residential Code of NY requires tha system be powered by a
non- unpluggable Transformer or 120V! Any one see that in NFPA 72 or 70?
There was some discussion about a guard around a transformer- to prevent
unwarranted removal.
My take is #1 its FPL wiring
#2 FPL listed transformer or Class 3 is acceptable
( he wants a permanently wired transformer- like a bell tranny!)
My reply was most Manufacturers submit the transformer(plug-in)AND
Control Panel for listing by UL- I violate that by substituting a tranny of
non-listed origin and open up a liability issue!
Comments and Replys appreciated!
Mike Sokoly
MES Security Systems
secure15@xxxxxxxxxxxxx




.

Loading