Re: US House Democrats: Green Light on Iran Attack



On 2007-01-14, Beacon <beacon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

"TUKA" <tuka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:slrneqgr2a.7uv.tuka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
["Followup-To:" header set to alt.religion.islam.]
On 2007-01-13, Beacon <beacon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

"Zeno" <Zeno@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:musfq2lrfot7969cgtcuf5tvaouppf8hvi@xxxxxxxxxx
On Tue, 9 Jan 2007 14:11:28 -0000, "Beacon" <beacon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:


"Zeno" <Zeno@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:12a6q25qp7v9tuvk6mrvma8bj4gpbdglrv@xxxxxxxxxx
On Mon, 8 Jan 2007 19:14:39 -0000, "Beacon" <beacon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

They are great examples of propaganda jihad of the tongue.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jihad


Would this be the JIHAD that the MuJIHADeen were involved in when
the
US
SUPPORTED them?

You don't seem to understand the word "jihad". Perhaps this will
help.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jihad

I understand that tthe word "Jihad" in MuJIHADeen is the same as
"Jihad"
.
Cant you answer?
Would this be the JIHAD that the MuJIHADeen were involved in when the
US
SUPPORTED them?


All muslims practice jihad or "struggle", else they are bad muslims.
Posting propaganda here (you?), as well as the mujahideen, are all
examples of muslim or jihadi behavior (with secret suicidal wish).

thats like claiming that christians all want to be crusified because
they
believe in the cross or use it as a symbol!

Why wont you answer the question?

Are you afraid to admit that the US supported the Mujihadeen when
Saddam
spurned Muslim muslim fundamentalists?

Your questions aren't relevant.

Evasion noted!

Evasion? No, you are trying to sell the idea that the usual
Muslim tactic when confronted with something:

No im asking: Are you afraid to admit that the US supported the Mujihadeen
when Saddam spurned Muslim muslim fundamentalists?

Of course you are. It is called a red herring. When you run into
something you can't answer, you say:

"Hey, look at that pile of stinking shit over THERE! What
about that?"

That is what your question is. When you answer the appropriate question
yourself, *then* you can do that. But you can't just evade by repeated
accusation -- that is the fallacy of the red herring.

All Muslim supporters can do is bring in red herrings and make personal
attacks. They have no answers for why there are no world-class
universities, products, or businesses founded and operated by Muslims.
They have failed to educate their children in the skills needed to
support their growing populations. They have led their people to hate
and resentment instead of peace and contentment. They refuse to take the
blinders off, roll up their sleeves, and get to work starting to fix the
mess they have gotten themselves into.

It is the Muslims fault. And they can't stand the thought of that, so
they blame the West and Israel. And western liberals co-sign the
process; bozos like you point fingers at the west while completely
ignoring the depravity of the majority Arabs.

--

Few blame themselves until they have exhausted all other possibilities.
-- anonymous
.