Re: The Fall of France and the Multicultural World War
- From: "Bob Cooper" <rcooper1@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 21:24:56 -0400
"Cuthbert Thistlethwaite" <nosillygods@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:44458429.C9888EB@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Bob Cooper wrote:
http://tinyurl.com/fo8lu
"At the siege of Vienna in 1683 Islam seemed poised to overrun Christian
Europe. We are in a new phase of a very old war."
Exactly what I've been saying since first noticing islam, on 9-11-01.
Where are Jan Sobieski and his Polish cavalry when we need them :>)
. . .
According to some, one out of
three babies born in France is now a Muslim.
This can be dealt with but requires understanding of "freedom of
religion" to be conditioned similarly as any other adult freedom, which
requires a certain age and proper behavior, as in drinking, driving,
marrying, bearing arms, etc.
The writer states that western China is one of the places where the
secular forces (here, Chinese communism) are re-claiming hearts, minds,
and real-estate from islam.
One of the Chinese tactics, as I understand it, is that churches are for
the over 21: i.e., adults making a free choice about how they're
spending their time.
I'm trying to say that it is possible to make the idea of a "baby
moslem", or being born as a member of any religion at all, to go away
permanently from society, but everyone wants to bring kids to churches.
It happened to me.
Also, the Chinese always get beat up about cracking down on Chinese
religious nuts, but I'm cheering them on, this time.
Around 70% of French prisoners are Muslims.
More death penalty and deportation penalties needed.
Hundreds of Muslim ghettos are already de facto
following sharia, not French law.
Similar to any racial-linguistic ghetto, which is why countries should
enforce their own languages. The French have long been fussy about
French, so they should enforce French in France. And guess what we in
the US should do, imo?
We should, imo, require immigrants to speak, read and write English, just
as the French should require them to speak, read and write French.
Some have pointed out that the French
military are not always squeamish,
No, they are not. Consider Simon de Montfort, who struggled against the
Albigensians in the South of France.
but there are estimates that 15% of the
armed forces are already made up of Muslims, and rising.
Somebody has to change the oil in the motors, and peel the potatoes, in
any good army.
People keep talking about the nukes that the Iranians may get, but what about
the hundreds of nuclear warheads the French have? Will they be used to
intimidate the rest of the West? How do we handle an Islamic France, still the
heartland of the European continent, with Muslim control of hundreds of nukes?
And how do we handle a Bosnia or Lebanon with a population much larger
than either of these countries, and with hundreds of nuclear warheads at
stake?
Well, now, there's a respectable precedent for that: South Africa. They
de-nuclearized, wrote the book on transparency of the process, and stood
down. The relevance is that the whites stood down and disarmed, in one
motion.
But don't forget that the French gave us St. Bartholomew's Day. The
French rose up one August morning and slew their near neighbors, whom
they knew as individuals. Must have been something like Rwanda 10 years
ago. I encourage the French here.
If Muslim immigration continues,
No, *all* migration, and un-controlled, informal, illegal, criminal
migration most of all, continues, then you get a result that sucks.
(...)
The population movements we are witnessing now are the largest and fastest
in human history. In Europe, they can only be compared to the period often
referred to as the Migration Period, following the disintegration of the Roman
Empire. However, during the 4th and 5th centuries, the total human population
of the world was in the order of 200 million. Today, it is 30 times larger than
that, and still growing fast. We also have communications that can transport
people anywhere on earth within hours, and media that show ordinary people
how much better life is in other countries. On top of that, the Romans didn't
have human rights lawyers advocating that millions of barbarians be let into
their lands. Is it a coincidence that the last time we had migrations like this
was when large parts of the European continent suffered a complete
civilizational breakdown? Is that what we are witnessing now? The second
fall of Rome?
Well-said. Ari is not a migration forum, but as long as moslems
migrate, ari is not OT for migration commentary.
(...)
========================================================
Read the whole thing. Fjordman offers speculation about a number of possible
alternative scenarios for the future of Europe.
This is the one I liked best:
"Cultures collide: Muslim immigrants will be expelled from Europe unless
they reverse the growing perception of them as a social threat"
Um, expelled to the middle east and africa, not to Canada, US, England,
or anywhere else good like that, of course.
If they're going to do that, istm they better start soon. With the current
demographics, it's only a matter of time until the question becomes, "Who
is going to expel whom?" And, who remains behind with all those nukes?
.
- References:
- The Fall of France and the Multicultural World War
- From: Bob Cooper
- Re: The Fall of France and the Multicultural World War
- From: Cuthbert Thistlethwaite
- The Fall of France and the Multicultural World War
- Prev by Date: Re: Israeli occupation troops open fire on Children, peace volunteers in Nablus
- Next by Date: Re: Islam EXPLAINED: Black stone in Mecca ...
- Previous by thread: Re: The Fall of France and the Multicultural World War
- Next by thread: GATEWAY TO EUROPE
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading
