Europe's Contempt For Other Cultures Can't Be Sustained
- From: "friend" <hurrah@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 17 Feb 2006 21:06:32 -0800
A continent that inflicted colonial brutality all over the globe for
200 years has little claim to the superiority of its values
By Martin Jacques
02/17/06 "The Guardian" -- -- Is the argument over the Danish cartoons
really reducible to a matter of free speech? Even if we believe that
free speech is a fundamental value, that does not give us carte blanche
to say what we like in any context, regardless of consequence or
effect. Respect for others, especially in an increasingly
interdependent world, is a value of at least equal importance.
Europe has never had to worry too much about context or effect because
for around 200 years it dominated and colonised most of the world. Such
was Europe's omnipotence that it never needed to take into account the
sensibilities, beliefs and attitudes of those that it colonised,
however sacred and sensitive they might have been. On the contrary,
European countries imposed their rulers, religion, beliefs, language,
racial hierarchy and customs on those to whom they were entirely alien.
There is a profound hypocrisy - and deep historical ignorance - when
Europeans complain about the problems posed by the ethnic and religious
minorities in their midst, for that is exactly what European colonial
rule meant for peoples around the world. With one crucial difference,
of course: the white minorities ruled the roost, whereas Europe's new
ethnic minorities are marginalised, excluded and castigated, as recent
events have shown.
But it is no longer possible for Europe to ignore the sensibilities of
peoples with very different values, cultures and religions. First,
western Europe now has sizeable minorities whose origins are very
different from the host population and who are connected with their
former homelands in diverse ways. If European societies want to live in
some kind of domestic peace and harmony - rather than in a state of
Balkanisation and repression - then they must find ways of integrating
these minorities on rather more equal terms than, for the most part,
they have so far achieved. That must mean, among other things, respect
for their values. Second, it is patently clear that, globally speaking,
Europe matters far less than it used to - and in the future will count
for less and less. We must not only learn to share our homelands with
people from very different roots, we must also learn to share the world
with diverse peoples in a very different kind of way from what has been
the European practice.
Europe has little experience of this, and what experience it has is
mainly confined to less than half a century. Old attitudes of
superiority and disdain - dressed up in terms of free speech, progress
or whatever - are still very powerful. Nor - as many liberals like to
think - are they necessarily in decline. On the contrary, racial
bigotry is on the rise, even in countries that have previously been
regarded as tolerant. The Danish government depends for its rule on a
racist, far-right party that gained 13% of the seats in the last
election. The decision of Jyllands-Posten to publish the cartoons - and
papers in France, Germany, Italy and elsewhere to reprint them - lay
not so much in the tradition of free speech but in European contempt
for other cultures and religions: it was a deliberate, calculated
insult to the beliefs of others, in this case Muslims.
This kind of mentality - combining Eurocentrism, old colonial attitudes
of supremacism, racism, provincialism and sheer ignorance - will serve
our continent ill in the future. Europe must learn to live in and with
the world, not to dominate it, nor to assume it is superior or more
virtuous. Any continent that has inflicted such brutality on the world
over a period of 200 years has not too much to be proud of, and much to
be modest and humble about - though this is rarely the way our history
is presented in Britain, let alone elsewhere. It is worth remembering
that while parts of Europe have had free speech (and democracy) for
many decades, its colonies were granted neither. But when it comes to
our "noble values", our colonial record is always written out of the
script.
This attitude of disdain, of assumed superiority, will be increasingly
difficult to sustain. We are moving into a world in which the west will
no longer be able to call the tune as it once did. China and India will
become major global players alongside the US, the EU and Japan. For the
first time in modern history the west will no longer be overwhelmingly
dominant. By the end of this century Europe is likely to pale into
insignificance alongside China and India. In such a world, Europe will
be forced to observe and respect the sensibilities of others.
Few in Europe understand or recognise these trends. A small example is
the bitter resistance displayed on the continent to the proposed
takeover of Arcelor by Mittal Steel: at root the opposition is based on
thinly disguised racism. But Europe had better get used to such a
phenomenon: takeovers by Indian and Chinese firms are going to become
as common as American ones. A profound parochialism grips our
continent. When Europe called the global tune it did not matter,
because what happened in Europe translated itself into a global trend
and a global power. No more: now it is simply provincialism.
When Europe dominated, there were no or few feedback loops. Or, to put
it another way, there were few, if any, consequences for its behaviour
towards the non-western world: relations were simply too unequal. Now -
and increasingly in the future - it will be very different. And the
subject of these feedback loops, or consequences, will concern not just
present but also past behaviour.
For 200 years the dominant powers have also been the colonial powers:
the European countries, the US and Japan. They have never been required
to pay their dues for what they did to those whom they possessed and
treated with contempt. Europeans have treated this chapter in their
history by choosing to forget. So has Japan, except that in its case
its neighbours have not only refused to forget but are also
increasingly powerful. As a consequence, Japan's present and future is
constantly stalked by its history. This future could also lie in wait
for Europe. We might think the opium wars are "simply history"; the
Chinese (rightly) do not. We might think the Bengal famine belongs in
the last century, but Indians do not.
Europe is moving into a very different world. How will it react? If
something like the attitude of the Danes prevails - a combination of
defensiveness, fear, provincialism and arrogance - then one must fear
for Europe's ability to learn to live in this new world. There is
another way, but the signs are none too hopeful.
----------------------------------------
Well put!
At least some voices of reason are on the rise.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Europe's Contempt For Other Cultures Can't Be Sustained
- From: Cuthbert Thistlethwaite
- Re: Europe's Contempt For Other Cultures Can't Be Sustained
- From: Richard Dell
- Re: Europe's Contempt For Other Cultures Can't Be Sustained
- From: Warren Hopper
- Re: Europe's Contempt For Other Cultures Can't Be Sustained
- From: robert merritt
- Re: Europe's Contempt For Other Cultures Can't Be Sustained
- Prev by Date: How to bankrupt Islam !
- Next by Date: The choice: obedience or annihilation
- Previous by thread: How to bankrupt Islam !
- Next by thread: Re: Europe's Contempt For Other Cultures Can't Be Sustained
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading