Re: France: Iran has secret military nuke program

In response to:

kuff (Isaac Adams) wrote:
Count 1 wrote:
Luck is not a factor. ;-) Get educated on this topic and come back to
me.

You get educated.

I am Kuff. I'm especially educated on what Iran's been up to.

You have a very poor way of demonstrating that.


The NYT story is obviously a plant - probably paid
for by some of the nearly $1 billion the US spends on propaganda.

LOL. I only raised the NYT report as an example of how totally ignorant you
are on this topic, and its similar to other topics you've tried to discuss
in the past where you display an 'active ignorance'.

The story was crap and illustrates my point far more than it does
yours.



Comparing the story with the report "speaking for itself" makes this
quite obvious. You can almost hear the arguments on whether to include
the word "Pakistan" in the story. :-)

I'm sure your fantasies are getting so real you're beginning to hear them.

I recorded them. And documented them in my posting. You snipped the
posting then labeled it a "fantasy". That idiot tactic won't work
fool.


Deal with the facts Kuff.

Which I documented. Everything you throw up for evidence is crap -
which must be why you are so reluctant to do it. Preferring instead
label things per your own fantasies without regard for what they
actually are.

Tough beans.

And learn to rationally analyze things while
you're at it. Your summation of the IAEA report in comparison to the NYT
article was pathetic.

A couple of demonstrable lies, a few misleading innuendos. How much
more did your find wrong with it?

Since your ignorant of what's going on your
innuendoes won't help you with me.

The lies are based on facts. The report speaking for itself. I
don't have to "innuendo" when I have facts. You, on the other hand,
seem able to only innuendo and falsely label because you really don't
have anything else.


Lately you've displayed a willingness to uncritically accept whatever
various governments want you to accept, both American and Iranian.

Uh, are you sure? As you've snipped away I almost never hear what
the Iranian government has to say thanks to the "persuasion" of the
Western MSM. And I'm pretty critical of what the American government
has to say - for example, in the NYT article just analyzed. :-)


Here's some statements from Condi Rice on Iran you should have no problems
swallowing...

http://www.dailystar.com.lb/article.asp?edition_id=10&categ_id=2&article_id=22294

You are an increasingly isolated voice. You probably think this indicates
sophistication on your part, but in fact it only displays your ignorance,
obstinance, and arrogance.

:-)

Bit of a reach there fellow.

And you got to know that isolation don't faze me one bit.

Feel free to substitute name calling for evidence if you want but it's
a pretty threadbare tactic.


Count 1 wrote:
Feel free to substitute name calling for evidence if you want but it's
a pretty threadbare tactic.

I agree. However I didn't call you a name (unlike your penchant for calling
me an ***, or other temper tantrums you've had lately) so again we see
you being actively ignorant. Identifying you as 'ignorant, obstinant, and
arrogant' isn't being insulting, its being helpful. Now you know what your
limitations are and now you have the tools to rise above them.

I see very clearly what your limitations are. And, alas, they're not
due to ignorance but fully aware willfulness, distortion and lies.

When that results in killing people we call that "evil" in my neck of
the woods.


BTW - did you catch the Iranian response to the French statement? Its all
over the MSM, as is lots of information about Iran, including their stupider
excuses you've decided to uncritically accept.

Since you probably missed it - their response amounted to 'the French better
shut up.'

But when the Iranians speak for themselves they actually said:

"I recommend that Mr. Douste-Blazy speak in diplomatic terms and
avoid increasing tension," Iranian state-run television quoted him
[Iran's chief negotiator, Ali Larijani] as saying. "The motivation of
the French foreign minister behind his new comments is ambiguous to us.
But it is in the interests of the region that the West adopts a logical
stance toward Iran's nuclear activities."


Like I said - three cheers for france.

.

Loading