Re: Media Bias authors fellows at conservative think tanks (Re: File under 'Duh'.


"brickbat" <brickbat@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:brickbat-32D040.22311222122005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> In article <yZEqf.51626$2k.19015@pd7tw1no>,
> "Count 1" <omnipitus2002@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > "kuff (Isaac Adams)" <kuff00@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > news:1135283278.870258.312110@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > http://mediamatters.org/items/200512220003
> >
> > Paul Waldman is the author of this piece, one of the most biased to the
> > 'left' essayists and media analysts out there. It was entirely
predictable
> > that an author displaying the strident bias and hatred for conservatism
Mr.
> > Waldman does would do everything he can to discredit this report.
> >
> > I'll keep an eye out for Mr. Groseclose's reply, if he feels the need to
> > reply to a partisan hack like Waldman.
> >
> > I'm not particularly impressed with any study that states the obvious,
ie -
> > there is on the whole a left wing bias in the US media. That's
perceptible
> > by anyone who regularly reads a wide assortment of American media and
> > understands the basic differences between left and right wing ideologies
in
> > the American context.
>
> That proves it; Count says so.
>
> And everyone he disagrees with is a "leftist hack".

Yep. Thanks Brickbat. Glad to see you're starting to see the light.


.

Relevant Pages