Re: More on Iranian support for AQ


"Abdiel" <abdiel_bc@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1135112212.182361.150470@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Count 1 wrote:
> > "Abdiel" <abdiel_bc@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > news:1135109270.801464.118450@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > > Count 1 wrote:
> > > > "Abdiel" <abdiel_bc@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > > > news:1135107359.872328.162090@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > >
> > > > > Count 1 wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > When I read their reports, I can hear the angels
singing. A
> > > > glow
> > > > > > > > surrounds
> > > > > > > > > > me, and I am transported to a paradise of truth.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Then you're an idiot.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I know this is probably just an oversight on your part, but for
some
> > > > strange
> > > > > > reason you removed my question...
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > That's because it's stupid.
> > > >
> > > > Then you should have no problem addressing it. Do you think I'm
idiotic
> > > > enough to believe in your prophet, especially considering his rather
> > > > colorful history?
> > > >
> > >
> > > That's a question that presupposes an answer based on a fallacy,
namely
> > > that you'd have to be an idiot to be a Muslim--a fallacy broken very
> > > easily by the fact that there are a great many hyperintelligent
Muslims
> > > in the world, men and women much, much, much smarter than you.
> >
> > Whether they are "smarter" than me in some undefined intellectual
discipline
> > doesn't speak to the fact that they believe in a fallacy called islam,
and
> > revere a very poor example of personhood in the individual mohammed.
> >
> > Most of
> > > whom, for instance, can clearly define and identify a valid and sound
> > > deductive argument, while it's been proven that you cannot, and since
> > > just about anybody would agree that careful, logical, and sound
> > > thinking is a prerequisite *not* to be considered an idiot, I think
> > > it's presumpuous of you to consider yourself any smarter than them.
> >
> > Actually if you recall correctly you conceded you didn't know what a
> > deductive argument was, considering you originally thought it was based
on a
> > premise, rather than a sound or universally accepted premise.
> >
> > > > > > I have made no indication of my feelings regarding the veracity
of
> > this
> > > > > > report.
> > > > >
> > > > > Count 1: "More on Iranian support for AQ." Not "More *allegations
of*
> > > > > Iranian support for AQ."
> > > >
> > > > It was 'more'. 'More' of what I leave up to the mature reader to
> > discern.
> > >
> > > More on Iranian support for AQ, as if it's suppsed there already is
> > > *some* on Iranian support for AQ.
> >
> > There is. Read the 9/11 Commission report for further education. You can
> > consider it the Tip of the Iceberg.
> >
>
> 1) Quote the parts of the 9/11 Commission report that reveal the Iranian
regime supports al Qaeda.

There are many 'parts'. Download it and read it for yourself. I'm not
interested in going to the effort of posting something you are merely going
to snip.

Don't you just hate it when people do that kind of selective snippage? I
know I do.

(plonked, btw. I'll let you out of the cage when I see you going after the
rabid jihadists websites with this level of veracity. Until then if you have
something you feel I must know about feel free to email my yahoo account.)


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Theology and Falsification - Antony Flew
    ... with whether a proposition contradicts itself or not? ... proctor-hoc or correlation does not equal causation. ... Note that with the post-hoc ergo proctor-hoc fallacy, ... Even with a sound argument one still has to separately consider ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: More on Iranian support for AQ
    ... >> in the world, men and women much, much, much smarter than you. ... Like clear, sound, and logical thought? ... And their existence breaks your fallacy, ... premises and a conclusion which, if both premises are assumed to be ...
    (alt.religion.islam)
  • Re: Trend less likely (Utility)
    ... > Great call on Timmyrocker's "Gambler's Fallacy" part! ... His kid was up to 5 times his money. ... those dealers that starts cajoling naive players into betting too much, ... You sound like either a shill or a perfect casino sheep. ...
    (rec.gambling.craps)
  • Re: Which one do you think is worse?
    ... > This might sound weird, but I kind of like when I get "nothing" for a long ... It's the Gambler's fallacy at work. ... TD Lowball -- ... Prev by Date: ...
    (rec.gambling.poker)