Re: ANOTHER SCENARIO FOR THE MYTH OF FISH EVOLUTION; THE BBC'S "MISSING LINK FOUND" ERROR
- From: "Firnando" <geovani_the_italian@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 1 Dec 2005 12:58:39 -0800
LeNoir wrote:
> ANOTHER SCENARIO FOR THE MYTH OF FISH EVOLUTION; THE BBC'S "MISSING
> LINK FOUND" ERROR
>
>
> The 3 May, 2005, edition of the BBC web site reported on fossil
> findings dating back to 450 million years ago. As a result of the
> research, carried out by Richard Aldridge of Leicester University,
> various findings were made which were claimed to be a continuation of
> fossils discovered 11 years previously. In this report, the BBC sought
> to present the fossil findings in question as evidence for the scenario
> of fish evolution, using Aldridge's claims as its starting point.
>
> These findings, based entirely on conjecture and offering no evidence
> whatsoever for the imaginary evolutionary process, are another example
> of Darwinist death throes. No proof was offered to show the
> contribution made by the fossils in the report in question to the
> subject of evolution. The article went no further than giving glad
> tidings about the finding of the long-awaited "missing link."
>
> You can find genuine scientific statements about the fossil findings in
> question and the scenario of fish evolution below.
>
> The Grave Error to the Effect a Transitional Form Had Been Found
>
> For an evolutionist, it is impossible to arrive at a conclusion by
> obtaining proof. That is because every discovery shows that evolution
> never happened, and evolutionists are subjected to severe
> disappointment each time. For that reason, therefore, evolutionists
> always start with the conclusions they came to long beforehand and then
> seek to find proof for them. Researcher Richard Aldridge starts out
> from a preconception this way, and has devoted all his attention to
> finding a fossil that might represent evidence of the imaginary
> evolution of fish. He had no hesitation about stating that that he was
> unable to scientifically describe as a fish fossil he discovered in the
> south of Africa in 1994 and that he named Nelson. Yet he still insisted
> on referring to this as a fish fossil. (1) He continued his research in
> the same area and combining the new fossil traces he discovered there
> 11 years later with his previous finding, he claimed that this
> represented an intermediate form.
>
> First of all there is no evidence that these findings belong to a fish
> at all. Starting from the remains of soft tissue he found, Aldridge
> thought he had discovered an intermediate form between the phylum
> Cordata and fish. However, the fossil findings in his possession have
> no distinguishing features that might confirm the imaginary passage
> from an organism with no backbone to vertebrates. It would be a major
> transition for invertebrates, which have no skeleton and the hard parts
> of whose bodies are on the outside, to turn into fish, whose hard parts
> are in the middle of their bodies. Those fossil remains alleged to
> belong to intermediate forms need to be able to demonstrate that
> significant passage. However, Aldridge's discoveries provide no
> evidence that might confirm this. Instead, the author makes do with
> repeating, four or five times, his claim that the sought-after
> intermediate fossil had been found.
>
> The Fossil Fish That Make Fish Evolution Impossible
> No matter how much Darwinists may speculate on this subject, we are
> still looking at a manifest truth that totally eliminates all claims
> regarding the subject. A fossil fish found in China in 1999 dates back
> 530 million years. That, 530 years ago, i.e. the Cambrian Period, is
> just when various specimens of complex structures suddenly appeared and
> when representatives of 28 of the 42 known animal phyla emerged with
> all their details. The fish fossil in question, discovered in the
> Chinese region of Chengjiang, where best preserved fossils from that
> period have been found proves that 530 million years ago vertebrates
> existed with all the features they possess today, fully formed. This
> shows that fish and invertebrates, (the latter claimed to be the
> forerunner of the former) appeared at the same time.
>
> In the light of this, it is an out-and-out deception for evolutionists
> to stand up and allege that they had found an intermediate link
> approximately 100 million years younger than this fossil. This living
> thing, that existed fully formed and with all its component parts on
> Earth 530 million years ago, possesses complex features similar to
> present-day ones, and clearly never underwent any evolution at all. If
> evolutionists do set about finding an intermediate form then they
> should direct their attention to remains from 530 million years ago.
> However, all the pre-Cambrian fossils they find will be mere
> single-celled or simple multi-celled animals. Even Richard Dawkins, one
> of the most fanatical of present-day evolutionists was unable to avoid
> mentioning the extraordinary nature of that period and the dilemma
> which it posed for evolutionists:
>
> "And we find many of them already in an advanced state of evolution,
> the very first time they appear. It is as though they were just planted
> there, without any evolutionary history. Needless to say, this
> appearance of sudden planting has delighted creationists..."(2)
>
> The fact that a fish with all its complex features lived in such a
> period is important scientific evidence that will put an end to all
> debate over the issue. Fish have existed ever since the first complex
> organisms were seen on Earth, and were created in a moment with all
> their superior characteristics. The scientific evidence that proves
> creation against evolution has been set out in all clarity. All
> speculation on this issue is invalid. It is impossible for scientists
> like Aldridge or the BBC, one of their major news sources, to come up
> with any finding to alter that fact.
>
> The Effort to Deceive the Reader with Conjecture
> The fossil discoveries unearthed as a result of countless digs clearly
> show the existence of fossil fish dating back 530 million years and
> possessed of all their features. However, none of these countless
> excavations has ever turned up a single intermediate form with which to
> support the evolution scenario. Researchers such as Aldridge see
> nothing wrong in stating that the imaginary evolution of fish was a
> process that took place in stages and that this has been proven by the
> fossil record.
>
> Evolutionists' conjectural methods are no different. Constantly
> repeating something that is not actually true, suggesting that people
> do believe them, is the sole method to which Darwinists, who are left
> with no other way out, can resort. They employ this method persistently
> in every article, every case study and every report.
>
> The fact is, however, that scientists' statements conflict with the
> scientific evidence. Fossil findings provide no examples of an
> intermediate form. The imaginary "missing link," sought for so many
> years, has not been found. There is not even a single fossil that might
> confirm the existence of the imaginary process known as evolution.
> Instead, they keep finding themselves looking at complex organisms,
> whose existence goes back millions of years, similar to present-day
> living things. The fact of creation is constantly being verified. They
> will keep resorting to their traditional methods for so long as they
> refuse to admit this truth. This vicious circle will thus continue.
> However, the mass of readers they seek to influence can clearly see the
> evidence and are aware of the facts. Therefore, evolutionists'
> conjectural methods can have no effect on people capable of looking
> objectively and possessed of an open mind.
>
> The BBC needs to wake up to these facts as quickly as possible and
> abandon evolutionists' classic methods. Otherwise, this will damage
> the organisation's prestige and damage people's faith in the
> channel. We call on the BBC to report the news with these facts in mind
> from now on.
Can't argue with you.
You make a very good point!
.
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Lieberman 'encouraged' by Iraq visit
- Next by Date: CIA Director : 'Torture Is Counterproductive'
- Previous by thread: ANOTHER SCENARIO FOR THE MYTH OF FISH EVOLUTION; THE BBC'S "MISSING LINK FOUND" ERROR
- Next by thread: Re: @@Dealing with izlamist trolls
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading
