Re: Jesus must have been baptized in the name of...himself?
- From: kn_russellkinnaman@xxxxxxxxx (RUSSELL KINNAMAN)
- Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 18:20:52 -0800
Baptism is like marriage . A ritual the church developed that that need
a priest to perform so the church could get more money.A sort of
protection racket. set up to bilk the ones without the ability to reason
things out and seperate them from the thinkers. The thinkers would be
offered a position in good standing in the community or they would be
offed if they put up a fuss about the racket.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Jesus must have been baptized in the name of...himself?
- From: €€R.L.Measures
- Re: Jesus must have been baptized in the name of...himself?
- Prev by Date: Re: Jesus must have been baptized in the name of...himself?
- Next by Date: Re: Finally!
- Previous by thread: Re: Jesus must have been baptized in the name of...himself?
- Next by thread: Re: Jesus must have been baptized in the name of...himself?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|