Myths & Facts Online: Israel's Roots

http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/myths/mf1.html#a

MYTH

"The Jews have no claim to the land they call Israel."

FACT

A common misperception is that all the Jews were forced into the
Diaspora by the Romans after the destruction of the Second Temple in
Jerusalem in the year 70 C.E. and then, 1,800 years later, suddenly
returned to Palestine demanding their country back. In reality, the
Jewish people have maintained ties to their historic homeland for more
than 3,700 years.

The Jewish people base their claim to the Land of Israel on at least
four premises: 1) the Jewish people settled and developed the land; 2)
the international community granted political sovereignty in Palestine
to the Jewish people; 3) the territory was captured in defensive wars
and 4) God promised the land to the patriarch Abraham.

Even after the destruction of the Second Temple in Jerusalem and the
beginning of the exile, Jewish life in the Land of Israel continued and
often flourished. Large communities were reestablished in Jerusalem and
Tiberias by the ninth century. In the 11th century, Jewish communities
grew in Rafah, Gaza, Ashkelon, Jaffa and Caesarea.

The Crusaders massacred many Jews during the 12th century, but the
community rebounded in the next two centuries as large numbers of
rabbis and Jewish pilgrims immigrated to Jerusalem and the Galilee.
Prominent rabbis established communities in Safed, Jerusalem and
elsewhere during the next 300 years. By the early 19th century -
years before the birth of the modern Zionist movement - more than
10,000 Jews lived throughout what is today Israel.1 The 78 years of
nation-building, beginning in 1870, culminated in the reestablishment
of the Jewish State.

Israel's international "birth certificate" was validated by the promise
of the Bible; uninterrupted Jewish settlement from the time of Joshua
onward; the Balfour Declaration of 1917; the League of Nations Mandate,
which incorporated the Balfour Declaration; the United Nations
partition resolution of 1947; Israel's admission to the UN in 1949; the
recognition of Israel by most other states; and, most of all, the
society created by Israel's people in decades of thriving, dynamic
national existence.

"Nobody does Israel any service by proclaiming its 'right to exist.'

Israel's right to exist, like that of the United States, Saudi Arabia
and 152 other states, is axiomatic and unreserved. Israel's legitimacy
is not suspended in midair awaiting acknowledgement....

There is certainly no other state, big or small, young or old, that
would consider mere recognition of its 'right to exist' a favor, or a
negotiable concession."

- Abba Eban2




MYTH

"Palestine was always an Arab country."

FACT
The term "Palestine" is believed to be derived from the Philistines, an
Aegean people who, in the 12th Century B.C.E., settled along the
Mediterranean coastal plain of what are now Israel and the Gaza Strip.
In the second century C.E., after crushing the last Jewish revolt, the
Romans first applied the name Palaestina to Judea (the southern portion
of what is now called the West Bank) in an attempt to minimize Jewish
identification with the land of Israel. The Arabic word "Filastin" is
derived from this Latin name.3

The Hebrews entered the Land of Israel about 1300 B.C.E., living under
a tribal confederation until being united under the first monarch, King
Saul. The second king, David, established Jerusalem as the capital
around 1000 B.C.E. David's son, Solomon built the Temple soon
thereafter and consolidated the military, administrative and religious
functions of the kingdom. The nation was divided under Solomon's son,
with the northern kingdom (Israel) lasting until 722 B.C.E., when the
Assyrians destroyed it, and the southern kingdom (Judah) surviving
until the Babylonian conquest in 586 B.C.E. The Jewish people enjoyed
brief periods of sovereignty afterward before most Jews were finally
driven from their homeland in 135 C.E.

Jewish independence in the Land of Israel lasted for more than 400
years. This is much longer than Americans have enjoyed independence in
what has become known as the United States.4 In fact, if not for
foreign conquerors, Israel would be 3,000 years old today.

Palestine was never an exclusively Arab country, although Arabic
gradually became the language of most the population after the Muslim
invasions of the seventh century. No independent Arab or Palestinian
state ever existed in Palestine. When the distinguished Arab-American
historian, Princeton University Prof. Philip Hitti, testified against
partition before the Anglo-American Committee in 1946, he said: "There
is no such thing as 'Palestine' in history, absolutely not."5

Prior to partition, Palestinian Arabs did not view themselves as having
a separate identity. When the First Congress of Muslim-Christian
Associations met in Jerusalem in February 1919 to choose Palestinian
representatives for the Paris Peace Conference, the following
resolution was adopted:

We consider Palestine as part of Arab Syria, as it has never been
separated from it at any time. We are connected with it by national,
religious, linguistic, natural, economic and geographical bonds.6

In 1937, a local Arab leader, Auni Bey Abdul-Hadi, told the Peel
Commission, which ultimately suggested the partition of Palestine:
"There is no such country [as Palestine]! 'Palestine' is a term the
Zionists invented! There is no Palestine in the Bible. Our country was
for centuries part of Syria."7

The representative of the Arab Higher Committee to the United Nations
submitted a statement to the General Assembly in May 1947 that said
"Palestine was part of the Province of Syria" and that, "politically,
the Arabs of Palestine were not independent in the sense of forming a
separate political entity." A few years later, Ahmed Shuqeiri, later
the chairman of the PLO, told the Security Council: "It is common
knowledge that Palestine is nothing but southern Syria."8

Palestinian Arab nationalism is largely a post-World War I phenomenon
that did not become a significant political movement until after the
1967 Six-Day War and Israel's capture of the West Bank.



MYTH

"The Palestinians are descendants of the Canaanites and were in
Palestine long before the Jews."

FACT
Palestinian claims to be related to the Canaanites are a recent
phenomenon and contrary to historical evidence. The Canaanites
disappeared from the face of the earth three millennia ago, and no one
knows if any of their descendants survived or, if they did, who they
would be.

Sherif Hussein, the guardian of the Islamic Holy Places in Arabia, said
the Palestinians' ancestors had only been in the area for 1,000 years.9
Even the Palestinians themselves have acknowledged their association
with the region came long after the Jews. In testimony before the
Anglo-American Committee in 1946, for example, they claimed a
connection to Palestine of more than 1,000 years, dating back no
further than the conquest of Muhammad's followers in the 7th century.10
And that claim is also dubious. Over the last 2,000 years, there have
been massive invasions that killed off most of the local people (e.g.,
the Crusades), migrations, the plague, and other manmade or natural
disasters. The entire local population was replaced many times over.
During the British mandate alone, more than 100,000 Arabs emigrated
from neighboring countries and are today considered Palestinians.

By contrast, no serious historian questions the more than
3,000-year-old Jewish connection to the Land of Israel, or the modern
Jewish people's relation to the ancient Hebrews.

"...[the Palestinian Arabs'] basic sense of corporate historic
identity was, at different levels, Muslim or Arab or - for some -
Syrian; it is significant that even by the end of the Mandate in 1948,
after thirty years of separate Palestinian political existence, there
were virtually no books in Arabic on the history of Palestine.."10a


MYTH
"The Balfour Declaration did not give Jews a right to a homeland in
Palestine."

FACT
In 1917, Britain issued the Balfour Declaration:

His Majesty's Government views with favor the establishment in
Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their
best endeavors to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being
clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the
civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in
Palestine or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any
other country.

The Mandate for Palestine included the Balfour Declaration. It
specifically referred to "the historical connections of the Jewish
people with Palestine" and to the moral validity of "reconstituting
their National Home in that country." The term "reconstituting" shows
recognition of the fact that Palestine had been the Jews' home.
Furthermore, the British were instructed to "use their best endeavors
to facilitate" Jewish immigration, to encourage settlement on the land
and to "secure" the Jewish National Home. The word "Arab" does not
appear in the Mandatory award.11

The Mandate was formalized by the 52 governments at the League of
Nations on July 24, 1922.

MYTH

"The 'traditional position' of the Arabs in Palestine was jeopardized
by Jewish settlement."

FACT
For many centuries, Palestine was a sparsely populated, poorly
cultivated and widely-neglected expanse of eroded hills, sandy deserts
and malarial marshes. As late as 1880, the American consul in Jerusalem
reported the area was continuing its historic decline. "The population
and wealth of Palestine has not increased during the last forty years,"
he said.12

The Report of the Palestine Royal Commission quotes an account of the
Maritime Plain in 1913:

The road leading from Gaza to the north was only a summer track
suitable for transport by camels and carts...no orange groves, orchards
or vineyards were to be seen until one reached [the Jewish village of]
Yabna [Yavne]....Houses were all of mud. No windows were anywhere to be
seen....The ploughs used were of wood....The yields were very
poor....The sanitary conditions in the village were horrible. Schools
did not exist....The western part, towards the sea, was almost a
desert....The villages in this area were few and thinly populated. Many
ruins of villages were scattered over the area, as owing to the
prevalence of malaria, many villages were deserted by their
inhabitants.13

Lewis French, the British Director of Development wrote of Palestine:

We found it inhabited by fellahin who lived in mud hovels and suffered
severely from the prevalent malaria....Large areas...were
uncultivated....The fellahin, if not themselves cattle thieves, were
always ready to harbor these and other criminals. The individual
plots...changed hands annually. There was little public security, and
the fellahin's lot was an alternation of pillage and blackmail by their
neighbors, the Bedouin.14

Surprisingly, many people who were not sympathetic to the Zionist cause
believed the Jews would improve the condition of Palestinian Arabs. For
example, Dawood Barakat, editor of the Egyptian paper Al-Ahram, wrote:
"It is absolutely necessary that an entente be made between the
Zionists and Arabs, because the war of words can only do evil. The
Zionists are necessary for the country: The money which they will
bring, their knowledge and intelligence, and the industriousness which
characterizes them will contribute without doubt to the regeneration of
the country."15

Even a leading Arab nationalist believed the return of the Jews to
their homeland would help resuscitate the country. According to Sherif
Hussein, the guardian of the Islamic Holy Places in Arabia:

The resources of the country are still virgin soil and will be
developed by the Jewish immigrants. One of the most amazing things
until recent times was that the Palestinian used to leave his country,
wandering over the high seas in every direction. His native soil could
not retain a hold on him, though his ancestors had lived on it for 1000
years. At the same time we have seen the Jews from foreign countries
streaming to Palestine from Russia, Germany, Austria, Spain, America.
The cause of causes could not escape those who had a gift of deeper
insight. They knew that the country was for its original sons
(abna'ihi­l­asliyin), for all their differences, a sacred and beloved
homeland. The return of these exiles (jaliya) to their homeland will
prove materially and spiritually [to be] an experimental school for
their brethren who are with them in the fields, factories, trades and
in all things connected with toil and labor.16

As Hussein foresaw, the regeneration of Palestine, and the growth of
its population, came only after Jews returned in massive numbers.

Mark Twain, who visited Palestine in 1867, described it as: "...[a]
desolate country whose soil is rich enough, but is given over wholly to
weeds-a silent mournful expanse....A desolation is here that not even
imagination can grace with the pomp of life and action....We never saw
a human being on the whole route....There was hardly a tree or a shrub
anywhere. Even the olive and the cactus, those fast friends of the
worthless soil, had almost deserted the country."17




MYTH

"Zionism is racism."

FACT
In 1975, the UN General Assembly adopted a resolution slandering
Zionism by equating it with racism. In his spirited response to the
resolution, Israel's Ambassador to the UN, Chaim Herzog noted the irony
of the timing, the vote coming exactly 37 years after Kristallnacht.

Zionism is the national liberation movement of the Jewish people, which
holds that Jews, like any other nation, are entitled to a homeland.

History has demonstrated the need to ensure Jewish security through a
national homeland. Zionism recognizes that Jewishness is defined by
shared origin, religion, culture and history. The realization of the
Zionist dream is exemplified by more than five million Jews, from more
than 100 countries, who are Israeli citizens.

Israel's Law of Return grants automatic citizenship to Jews, but
non-Jews are also eligible to become citizens under naturalization
procedures similar to those in other countries. Approximately 1,000,000
Muslim and Christian Arabs, Druze, Baha'is, Circassians and other
ethnic groups also are represented in Israel's population. The presence
in Israel of thousands of dark-skinned Jews from Ethiopia, Yemen and
India is the best refutation of the calumny against Zionism. In a
series of historic airlifts, labeled Moses (1984), Joshua (1985) and
Solomon (1991), Israel rescued almost 42,000 members of the ancient
Ethiopian Jewish community.

Zionism does not discriminate against anyone. Israel's open and
democratic character, and its scrupulous protection of the religious
and political rights of Christians and Muslims, rebut the charge of
exclusivity. Moreover, anyone - Jew or non-Jew, Israeli, American, or
Saudi, black, white, yellow or purple - can be a Zionist.

Writing after "Operation Moses" was revealed, William Safire noted:
"...For the first time in history, thousands of black people are
being brought to a country not in chains but in dignity, not as slaves
but as citizens."18


By contrast, the Arab states define citizenship strictly by native
parentage. It is almost impossible to become a naturalized citizen in
many Arab states, especially Algeria, Saudi Arabia and Kuwait. Several
Arab nations have laws that facilitate the naturalization of foreign
Arabs, with the specific exception of Palestinians. Jordan, on the
other hand, instituted its own "law of return" in 1954, according
citizenship to all former residents of Palestine, except for Jews.19

To single out Jewish self-determination for condemnation is itself a
form of racism. When approached by a student at Harvard in 1968 who
attacked Zionism, Martin Luther King responded: "When people criticize
Zionists, they mean Jews. You're talking anti-Semitism."20

The 1975 UN resolution was part of the Soviet-Arab Cold War anti-Israel
campaign. Almost all the former non-Arab supporters of the resolution
have apologized and changed their positions. When the General Assembly
voted to repeal the resolution in 1991, only some Arab and Muslim
states, as well as Cuba, North Korea and Vietnam were opposed.

MYTH

"The delegates of the UN World Conference Against Racism agreed that
Zionism is racism."

FACT
In 2001, Arab nations again were seeking to delegitimize Israel by
trying to equate Zionism with racism at the UN World Conference Against
Racism in Durban, South Africa. The United States joined Israel in
boycotting the conference when it became clear that rather than focus
on the evils of racism, anti-Semitism and xenophobia that were supposed
to be the subject of the event, the conference had turned into a forum
for bashing Israel.

The United States withdrew its delegation "to send a signal to the
freedom loving nations of the world that we will not stand by, if the
world tries to describe Zionism as racism. That is as wrong as wrong
can be." White House Press Secretary Ari Fleisher added that "the
President is proud to stand by Israel and by the Jewish community and
send a signal that no group around the world will meet with
international acceptance and respect if its purpose is to equate
Zionism with racism."21

MYTH

"The Zionists could have chosen another country besides Palestine."

FACT
In the late 19th century, the rise of religious and racist
anti-Semitism led to a resurgence of pogroms in Russia and Eastern
Europe, shattering promises of equality and tolerance. This stimulated
Jewish immigration to Palestine from Europe.

Simultaneously, a wave of Jews immigrated to Palestine from Yemen,
Morocco, Iraq and Turkey. These Jews were unaware of Theodor Herzl's
political Zionism or of European pogroms. They were motivated by the
centuries-old dream of the "Return to Zion" and a fear of
intolerance. Upon hearing that the gates of Palestine were open, they
braved the hardships of travel and went to the Land of Israel.

The Zionist ideal of a return to Israel has profound religious roots.
Many Jewish prayers speak of Jerusalem, Zion and the Land of Israel.
The injunction not to forget Jerusalem, the site of the Temple, is a
major tenet of Judaism. The Hebrew language, the Torah, laws in the
Talmud, the Jewish calendar and Jewish holidays and festivals all
originated in Israel and revolve around its seasons and conditions.
Jews pray toward Jerusalem and recite the words "next year in
Jerusalem" every Passover. Jewish religion, culture and history make
clear that it is only in the land of Israel that the Jewish
commonwealth can be built.

In 1897, Jewish leaders formally organized the Zionist political
movement, calling for the restoration of the Jewish national home in
Palestine, where Jews could find sanctuary and self-determination, and
work for the renascence of their civilization and culture.

MYTH

"Herzl himself proposed Uganda as the Jewish state as an alternative
to Palestine."

FACT
Theodor Herzl sought support from the great powers for the creation of
a Jewish homeland. He turned to Great Britain, and met with Joseph
Chamberlain, the British colonial secretary and others. The British
agreed, in principle, to Jewish settlement in East Africa.

At the Sixth Zionist Congress at Basle on August 26, 1903, Herzl
proposed the British Uganda Program as a temporary emergency refuge for
Jews in Russia in immediate danger. While Herzl made it clear that this
program would not affect the ultimate aim of Zionism, a Jewish entity
in the Land of Israel, the proposal aroused a storm at the Congress and
nearly led to a split in the Zionist movement. The Jewish
Territorialist Organization (ITO) was formed as a result of the
unification of various groups who had supported Herzl's Uganda
proposals during the period 1903-1905. The Uganda Program, which never
had much support, was formally rejected by the Zionist movement at the
Seventh Zionist Congress in 1905.

MYTH

"All Arabs opposed the Balfour Declaration, seeing it as a betrayal
of their rights."

FACT
Emir Faisal, son of Sherif Hussein, the leader of the Arab revolt
against the Turks, signed an agreement with Chaim Weizmann and other
Zionist leaders during the 1919 Paris Peace Conference. It acknowledged
the "racial kinship and ancient bonds existing between the Arabs and
the Jewish people" and concluded that "the surest means of working out
the consummation of their national aspirations is through the closest
possible collaboration in the development of the Arab states and
Palestine." Furthermore, the agreement looked to the fulfillment of
the Balfour Declaration and called for all necessary measures "...to
encourage and stimulate immigration of Jews into Palestine on a large
scale, and as quickly as possible to settle Jewish immigrants upon the
land through closer settlement and intensive cultivation of the
soil."22

Faisal had conditioned his acceptance of the Balfour Declaration on the
fulfillment of British wartime promises of independence to the Arabs.
These were not kept.

Critics dismiss the Weizmann-Faisal agreement because it was never
enacted; however, the fact that the leader of the Arab nationalist
movement and the Zionist movement could reach an understanding is
significant because it demonstrated that Jewish and Arab aspirations
were not necessarily mutually exclusive.

MYTH

"The Zionists made no effort to compromise with the Arabs."

FACT
In 1913, the Zionist leadership recognized the desirability of reaching
an agreement with the Arabs. Sami Hochberg, owner of the newspaper,
Le-Jeune-Turc, informally represented the Zionists in a meeting with
the Cairo-based Decentralization Party and the anti-Ottoman Beirut
Reform Society and was able to reach an agreement. This "entente
verbale" led to the adoption of a resolution assuring Jews equal
rights under a decentralized government. Hochberg also secured an
invitation to the First Arab Congress held in Paris in June 1913.

The Arab Congress proved to be surprisingly receptive to Zionist
aspirations. Hochberg was encouraged by the Congress's favorable
response to the entente verbale. Abd-ul-Hamid Yahrawi, the President of
the Congress, summed up the attitude of the delegates:

All of us, both Muslims and Christians, have the best of feelings
toward the Jews. When we spoke in our resolutions about the rights and
obligations of the Syrians, this covered the Jews as well. Because they
are our brothers in race and we regard them as Syrians who were forced
to leave the country at one time but whose hearts always beat together
with ours, we are certain that our Jewish brothers the world over will
know how to help us so that our common interests may succeed and our
common country will develop both materially and morally (author's
emphasis).23

The entente verbale Hochberg negotiated was rendered ineffectual by
wartime developments. The outspoken Arab opposition to the Balfour
Declaration convinced the Zionist leadership of the need to make a more
concerted effort to reach an understanding with the Arabs.

Chaim Weizmann considered the task important enough to lead a Zionist
Commission to Palestine to explain the movement's aims to the Arabs.
Weizmann went first to Cairo in March 1918 and met with Said Shukeir,
Dr. Faris Nimr and Suleiman Bey Nassif (Syrian Arab nationalists who
had been chosen by the British as representatives). He stressed the
desire to live in harmony with the Arabs in a British Palestine.

Weizmann's diplomacy was successful. Nassif said "there was room in
Palestine for another million inhabitants without affecting the
position of those already there."24 Dr. Nimr disseminated information
through his Cairo newspaper to dispel the Arab public's
misconceptions about Zionist aims.25

In 1921, Winston Churchill tried to arrange a meeting between
Palestinians and Zionists. On November 29, 1921, the two sides met, but
no progress was made becaue the Arabs insisted that the Balfour
Declaration be abrogated.26

Weizmann led a group of Zionists that met with Syrian nationalist Riad
al-Sulh in 1921. The Zionists agreed to support Arab nationalist
aspirations and Sulh said he was willing to recognize the Jewish
National Home. The talks resumed a year later and raised hopes for an
agreement. In May 1923, however, Sulh's efforts to convince
Palestinian Arab leaders that Zionism was an accomplished fact were
rejected.27

Over the next 25 years, Zionist leaders inside and outside Palestine
would try repeatedly to negotiate with the Arabs. Similarly, Israeli
leaders since 1948 have sought peace treaties with the Arab states, but
Egypt and Jordan are the only nations that have signed them.

MYTH

"The Zionists were colonialist tools of Western imperialism."

FACT
"Colonialism means living by exploiting others," Yehoshofat Harkabi
has written. "But what could be further from colonialism than the
idealism of city-dwelling Jews who strive to become farmers and
laborers and to live by their own work?"28

Moreover, as British historian Paul Johnson noted, Zionists were hardly
tools of imperialists given the powers' general opposition to their
cause. "Everywhere in the West, the foreign offices, defense
ministries and big business were against the Zionists."29

Emir Faisal also saw the Zionist movement as a companion to the Arab
nationalist movement, fighting against imperialism, as he explained in
a letter to Harvard law professor and future Supreme Court Justice
Felix Frankfurter on March 3, 1919, one day after Chaim Weizmann
presented the Zionist case to the Paris conference. Faisal wrote:

The Arabs, especially the educated among us, look with deepest sympathy
on the Zionist movement....We will wish the Jews a hearty welcome
home....We are working together for a reformed and revised Near East
and our two movements complete one another. The Jewish movement is
nationalist and not imperialist. And there is room in Syria for us
both. Indeed, I think that neither can be a real success without the
other (emphasis added).30

"Our settlers do not come here as do the colonists from the Occident
to have natives do their work for them; they themselves set their
shoulders to the plow and they spend their strength and their blood to
make the land fruitful. But it is not only for ourselves that we desire
its fertility. The Jewish farmers have begun to teach their brothers,
the Arab farmers, to cultivate the land more intensively; we desire to
teach them further: together with them we want to cultivate the land --
to 'serve' it, as the Hebrew has it. The more fertile this soil
becomes, the more space there will be for us and for them. We have no
desire to dispossess them: we want to live with them. We do not want to
dominate them: we want to serve with them....."

- Martin Buber31


In the 1940s, the Jewish underground movements waged an anti-colonial
war against the British. The Arabs, meanwhile, were concerned primarily
with fighting the Jews rather than expelling the British imperialists.

MYTH

"The British promised the Arabs independence in Palestine in the
Hussein-MacMahon Correspondence."

FACT
The central figure in the Arab nationalist movement at the time of
World War I was Hussein ibn 'Ali, who was appointed by the Turkish
Committee of Union and Progress to the position of Sherif of Mecca in
1908. As Sherif, Hussein was responsible for the custody of Islam's
shrines in the Hejaz and, consequently, was recognized as one of the
Muslims' spiritual leaders.

In July 1915, Hussein sent a letter to Sir Henry MacMahon, the High
Commissioner for Egypt, informing him of the terms for Arab
participation in the war against the Turks.

The letters between Hussein and MacMahon that followed outlined the
areas that Britain was prepared to cede to the Arabs. The
Hussein-MacMahon correspondence conspicuously fails to mention
Palestine. The British argued the omission had been intentional,
thereby justifying their refusal to grant the Arabs independence in
Palestine after the war.32 MacMahon explained:

I feel it my duty to state, and I do so definitely and emphatically,
that it was not intended by me in giving this pledge to King Hussein to
include Palestine in the area in which Arab independence was promised.
I also had every reason to believe at the time that the fact that
Palestine was not included in my pledge was well understood by King
Hussein.33

Nevertheless, the Arabs held then, as now, that the letters constituted
a promise of independence for the Arabs.

Text of Letters

MYTH

"The Arabs fought for freedom in World Wars I and II."

FACT
Contrary to the romantic fiction of the period, most of the Arabs did
not fight with the Allies against the Turks in World War I. David Lloyd
George, the British Prime Minister, noted that most Arabs fought for
their Turkish rulers. Faisal's supporters in Arabia were the exception.


In World War II, the Arabs were very slow to enter the war against
Hitler. Only Transjordan went along with the British in 1939. Iraq was
taken over by pro-Nazis in 1941 and joined the Axis powers. Most of the
Arab states sat on the fence, waiting until 1945 to see who would win.
By then, Germany was doomed and, since it was necessary to join the war
to qualify for membership in the nascent United Nations, the Arabs
belatedly began to declare war against Germany in 1945: Egypt, on
February 25; Syria, on February 27; Lebanon, on February 28; and Saudi
Arabia, on March 2. By contrast, some 30,000 Palestinian Jews fought
against Nazi Germany.

MYTH

"Israeli policies cause anti-Semitism."

FACT

Anti-Semitism has existed for centuries, well before the rise of the
modern State of Israel. Rather than Israel being the cause of
anti-Semitism, it is more likely that the distorted media coverage of
Israeli policies is reinforcing latent anti-Semitic views.

As writer Leon Wieseltier observed, "the notion that all Jews are
responsible for whatever any Jews do is not a Zionist notion. It is an
anti-Semitic notion." Wieseltier adds that attacks on Jews in Europe
have nothing whatsoever to do with Israel. To blame Jews for
anti-Semitism is similar to saying blacks are responsible for racism.

Many Jews may disagree with policies of a particular Israeli
government, but this does not mean that Israel is bad for the Jews. As
Wieseltier noted, "Israel is not bad for the Jews of Russia, who may
need a haven; or for the Jews of Argentina, who may need a haven; or
for any Jews who may need a haven."34

As noted in the fact about criticism of Israel, taking issue with
Israeli policies is acceptable if you do so because you believe that a)
Israel has the right to exist, and b) that changes will make Israel a
better place. In fact, such criticism, by Israelis, can be found in the
Israeli media every day. Criticism crosses the line, however, when it
delegitimizes Israel and is intended to weaken rather than strengthen
its institutions.


"Israel is the only state in the world today, and the Jews the only
people in the world today, that are the object of a standing set of
threats from governmental, religious, and terrorist bodies seeking
their destruction. And what is most disturbing is the silence, the
indifference, and sometimes even the indulgence, in the face of such
genocidal anti-Semitism."

- Canadian Minister of Justice and Attorney General Irwin Cotler35


MYTH

"Supporters of Israel only criticize Arabs and never Israelis."

FACT

Israel is not perfect. Even the most committed friends of Israel
acknowledge that the government sometimes makes mistakes, and that it
has not solved all the problems in its society. Supporters of Israel
may not emphasize these faults, however, because there is no shortage
of groups and individuals who are willing to do nothing but focus on
Israel's imperfections. The public usually has much less access to
Israel's side of the story of its conflict with the Arabs, or the
positive aspects of its society.

Israelis themselves are their own harshest critics. If you want to read
criticism of Israeli behavior, you do not need to seek out anti-Israel
sources, you can pick up any Israeli newspaper and find no shortage of
news and commentary critical of government policy. The rest of the
world's media provides constant attention to Israel and the coverage
is far more likely to be unfavorable than complimentary.

Myths and Facts also pulls no punches when it comes to addressing
Israel's responsibilities for events and policies that tarnish its
image, including Israel's role in the Palestinian refugee problem,
the massacre at Sabra and Shatila, and social and economic inequalities
between Jewish and Arab citizens of Israel.

Israel's supporters believe Israel has a right to exist and that
close relations between Israel and other nations in the world is in
everyone's best interest. When friends criticize Israel, it is
because they want the country to be better. Israel's detractors do
not have that goal; they are more interested in delegitimizing the
country, placing a wedge between Israel and its allies, and working
toward its destruction.

Friends of Israel do not try to whitewash the truth, but they do try to
put events in proper context. That is also our goal.

Notes
1Dan Bahat, ed. Twenty Centuries of Jewish Life in the Holy Land,
(Jerusalem: The Israel Economist, 1976), pp. 61-63.
2New York Times, (November 18, 1981).
3Yehoshua Porath, The Emergence of the Palestinian-Arab National
Movement, 1918-1929, (London: Frank Cass, 1974), p. 4.
4Max Dimont, Jews, God and History, (NY: Signet, 1962), pp. 49-53.
5Moshe Kohn, "The Arabs' 'Lie' of the Land," Jerusalem Post,
(October 18, 1991).
6Yehoshua Porath, Palestinian Arab National Movement: From Riots to
Rebellion: 1929-1939, vol. 2, (London: Frank Cass and Co., Ltd., 1977),
pp. 81-82.
7Moshe Kohn, "The Arabs' 'Lie' of the Land," Jerusalem Post,
(October 18, 1991).
8Avner Yaniv, PLO, (Jerusalem: Israel Universities Study Group of
Middle Eastern Affairs, August 1974), p. 5.
9Al-Qibla, (March 23, 1918), quoted in Samuel Katz, Battleground-Fact
and Fantasy in Palestine, (NY: Bantam Books, 1977), p. 128.
10British Government, Report of the Anglo-American Committee of
Enquiry, 1946, Part VI, (April 20, 1946).
10aBernard Lewis, Semites and Anti-Semites: An Inquiry into Conflict
and Prejudice, (New York: Norton, 1999), p. 186.
11Howard Sachar, A History of Israel: From the Rise of Zionism to Our
Time, (NY: Alfred A. Knopf, 1979), p. 129.
12Ben Halpern, The Idea of a Jewish State, (MA: Harvard University
Press, 1969), p. 108.
13Palestine Royal Commission Report, p. 233.
14Palestine Royal Commission Report, pp. 259-260.
15Neville Mandel, "Attempts at an Arab-Zionist Entente: 1913-1914,"
Middle Eastern Studies, (April 1965), p. 243.
16Al-Qibla, (March 23, 1918), quoted in Samuel Katz, Battleground-Fact
and Fantasy in Palestine, (NY: Bantam Books, 1977), p. 128.
17Mark Twain, The Innocents Abroad, (London, 1881).
18New York Times, (January 7, 1985).
19Jordanian Nationality Law, Article 3(3) of Law No. 6 of 1954,
Official Gazette, No. 1171, February 16, 1954.
20Seymour Martin Lipset, "The Socialism of Fools-The Left, the Jews and
Israel," Encounter, (December 1969), p. 24.
21White House briefing regarding U.S. threat to boycott the UN
Conference on racism, (July 27, 2001).
22Chaim Weizmann, Trial and Error, (NY: Schocken Books, 1966), pp.
246-247; Howard Sachar, A History of Israel: From the Rise of Zionism
to Our Time, (NY: Alfred A. Knopf, 1979), p. 121.
23Aharon Cohen, Israel and the Arab World, (NY: Funk and Wagnalls,
1970), p. 97.
24Jon Kimche, There Could Have Been Peace: The Untold Story of Why We
Failed With Palestine and Again With Israel, (England: Dial Press,
1973), pp. 136-137.
25Aharon Cohen, Israel and the Arab World, (NY: Funk and Wagnalls,
1970), p. 71-73.
26Yehoshua Porath, The Emergence of the Palestinian-Arab National
Movement, 1918-1929, (London: Frank Cass, 1974), pp. 65-67.
27Yehoshua Porath, The Emergence of the Palestinian-Arab National
Movement, 1918-1929, (London: Frank Cass, 1974), pp. 112-114.
28Yehoshofat Harkabi, Palestinians And Israel, (Jerusalem: Keter,
1974), p. 6.
29Paul Johnson, Modern Times: The World from the Twenties to the
Nineties, (NY: Harper & Row, 1983), p. 485.
30Samuel Katz, Battleground-Fact and Fantasy in Palestine, (NY: Bantam
Books, 1977), p. 55.
31From an open letter from Martin Buber to Mahatma Gandhi in 1939,
quoted in Arthur Hertzberg, The Zionist Idea, (PA: Jewish Publications
Society, 1997), p. 464.
32George Kirk, A Short History of the Middle East, (NY: Frederick
Praeger Publishers, 1964), p. 314.
33London Times, (July 23, 1937).
34Leon Wieseltier, "Israel, Palestine, and the Return of the
Binational Fantasy," The New Republic, (October 24, 2003).
35Jerusalem Post, (February 5, 2004).

.