Re: More on Iran's atoms.


Count 1 wrote:
> "kuff (Isaac Adams)" <kuff00@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:1125438099.505135.136270@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > Count 1 wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > Iraq does indeed present a very good reason as to why we
> > > need to
> > > > > be
> > > > > > > > > > > concerned when rogue regimes start to even *indicate*
> they
> > > may
> > > > > be
> > > > > > > > > building a
> > > > > > > > > > > bomb.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > It's an object lesson for not having a faith-based intel
> > > > > operation.
> > > > > > > :-)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Its an object lesson in not believing what rogue regimes
> tell
> > > you.
> > > > > :-)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The "rogue regime" said they didn't have WMD. Lo and
> behold...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The rogue regime also said it was abiding by all NPT provisions.
> Lo
> > > and
> > > > > > > behold....
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It was.
> > > > >
> > > > > LOL....Iran only admitted that Arak and Natanz were nuclear
> facilities
> > > after
> > > > > a dissident group revealed their existence to us. This lack of
> > > admission
> > > > > put them in direct violation of the NPT, which started this current
> > > crisis
> > > > > with Iran.
> > > > >
> > > > > Do you need to go over the basics again?
> > > >
> > > > One of us does.
> > >
> > > Ohhh...you were talking about Iraq. Pardon me - I thought we had
> > > transitioned back to the relevent subject matter.
> >
> > Must have been why you snipped out my explicit reference to Iraq, huh?
>
> I don't think I did snip it away. check again.

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.religion.islam/msg/bb822c93444973ef

> > > > > Iraq does indeed present a very good reason as to why we need to be
> > > > > concerned when rogue regimes start to even *indicate* they may be
> > > building a
> > > > > bomb.

> > > > It's an object lesson for not having a faith-based intel operation.
> :-)

> > > Its an object lesson in not believing what rogue regimes tell you. :-)

> > The "rogue regime" said they didn't have WMD. Lo and behold...

> The rogue regime also said it was abiding by all NPT provisions. Lo and
> behold....

It was. Where's the Iraqi WMD?

- - - - - - - - - -

>
> > > If its your contention that Iraq was abiding by the NPT then you really
> need
> > > to do some homework. Obeidi's book would be a good place to start. You
> > > might be surprised at just how much Iraq violated the NPT. In fact so
> much
> > > clandestine activity was uncovered after Gulf War one the IAEA had to
> > > significantly broaden its scope of searching activities.
> >
> > 15 years ago. I'm surprise to see you relying on such ancient
> > texts... :-)
>
> You made the claim iraq was abiding by the NPT.

When it was invaded. 15 years before I'm not sure about.

> Of course now you know
> better. You're welcome.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: More on Irans atoms.
    ... >> put them in direct violation of the NPT, ... Ohhh...you were talking about Iraq. ... If its your contention that Iraq was abiding by the NPT then you really need ... clandestine activity was uncovered after Gulf War one the IAEA had to ...
    (alt.religion.islam)
  • Re: More on Irans atoms.
    ... Must have been why you snipped out my explicit reference to Iraq, ... > If its your contention that Iraq was abiding by the NPT then you really need ... > clandestine activity was uncovered after Gulf War one the IAEA had to ... I'm surprise to see you relying on such ancient ...
    (alt.religion.islam)
  • Re: More on Irans atoms.
    ... > Must have been why you snipped out my explicit reference to Iraq, ... >> might be surprised at just how much Iraq violated the NPT. ... >> clandestine activity was uncovered after Gulf War one the IAEA had to ... I'm surprise to see you relying on such ancient ...
    (alt.religion.islam)