Re: Where's the evidence?
- From: "Azure Kite" <hanaram857@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 04:55:31 -0600
"Ross" <rossnospamplease@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:f5uvr399dbd0qf7shae0onlc4n533qsa54@xxxxxxxxxx
On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 20:00:44 +0900, Epi-Sode <ph667@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
duke wrote:On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 08:43:50 -0000, "Mary" <mary123@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"duke" <duckgumbo32@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:fj8or3l77qhsnj1r3tm2r2sgs5dk3528t9@xxxxxxxxxx
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 18:21:20 -0500, "SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim"Have you spoken to your invisible, imaginary friend in the sky recently
<killgod@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
No one that lacks a brain knows of God.Creation at it's finest. We call the Creator God by name.no one with a brain calls that god
duke?
Every day.
See Richard Dawkin's "The God Delusion" about talking to imaginary friends.
Don't bother. Dawkins is a bumbling idiot.
"Day proceeds to do exactly that. He scrupulously breaks down many of
the arguments and claims made by Dawkins, Harris, Hitchens, Dennett,
and Onfray in their books, and then demonstrates, with meticulously
detailed footnotes and references, why each one is flawed in some
fashion - logically fallacious, historically inaccurate,
mathematically incorrect, or statistically flawed.
www.unscrewingtheinscrutable.com/node/1727
Thanks for the link.I'll definitely pick that one up.
.
- References:
- Re: Where's the evidence?
- From: Ross
- Re: Where's the evidence?
- Prev by Date: Re: Where's the evidence?
- Next by Date: Hillary's MOST TESTED EMOTIONAL APPEAL Response
- Previous by thread: Re: Where's the evidence?
- Next by thread: Hillary's MOST TESTED EMOTIONAL APPEAL Response
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|