Re: Using US Christian Soldiers
- From: AcesLucky <acesLucky@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2006 08:35:46 -0700
Pie wrote:
For those who believe our armies which are comprised of 99.9 %
christians are in these Muslim countries killing Muslims and Christians
for the safety of the homeland we must ask ourselves how do these
oppressed mostly innocents impose any threat to our safety.
THEY DON"T....a handful of men hijacked planes and succesfully brough
them down on occupied buildings. The best these men had as weapons were
box cutters and planes.
We somehow ended up sending our christian men and women into these
ravaged nations and did very bad things. Mostly not there fault as war
does terible things to good men.
The final outcome is that US CHRISTIAN are killing MUSLIM and
CHRISTIANS in the middle east. We are there becasue of the influence
of Israel in the US Gov't, it is not hysteria or anti semitism. It is
fact, look how hard Joe Lieberman battles to have out Christian troops
in Muslim countries killing muslims. Look at the biggest lobby, Israeli
Lobby in DC and all the Jews in postions of national policy and it is
that obvious....no you are not an anti semite. You have seen the light.
The amout of money given to both parties but especiallyy the ones who
love sending american troops into muslim countries and look at their
constituents. Dem or Repbulican it doesn't make a difference. They are
bought fulltime by Israel.
I have seen hundreeds of US born and bred forego the US Military and
sign up with Israel.
What can we make of this?
Support the pullout of US troops in Iraq and watch the pariahs selling
war. It is never as simple as Good vs Evil
We are there because Saddam planed to decouple his vast oil supply from the US Dollar. The embargo prevented that, and we in no way wanted to turn the world's largest (virtually untapped) oil supply, over to our own puppet. Yes, we put him in power (by Bush senior when he headed the CIA), we sold him the weapons of mass destruction to kill the Iranians during the conflict with the Ayatollah Khomeini (brokered by, guess who; Donald Rumsfeld). And, yes, we took him out.
We need the oil as we, and next rapidly approaching China, are the largest consumers of it. (We now consume more than we can produce.) Our economy depends on it. And no American president (Clinton had Saddam on a perpetual full court press during his presidency, too) is going to let that oil fall into the hands of...well...anybody.
The first thing we did when we got there was to secure the oil (not the oldest human treasures of civilization on earth --- we allow them to be looted). Priorities!
We're not fighting for our freedom. (Any half mature mind can see through that.) We're fighting for our economic security. Everything else is just a means to that end. Whoever wins Iraq, wins the next century. Oil is not a renewable energy source! And we now use and import more than we can produce. (Iraq was *never* a threat to our freedom!)
Oil runs the world. Religion is how mass minds are controlled. Eventually science will undermine religion, but he who controls the world's energy supply, controls the world. (And that's also why we don't want "them" to develop nuclear energy. Granted...allowing "them" to have nuclear bombs is also a bad idea.)
AcesLucky
.
- References:
- Using US Christian Soldiers
- From: Pie
- Using US Christian Soldiers
- Prev by Date: RELIGIOUS SCRIPTURES ARE IN PLACE OF GOD, NOT OF GOD.
- Next by Date: REFUSING DIVINE GIFTS OF GRACE.
- Previous by thread: Using US Christian Soldiers
- Next by thread: I Guess Only Christians Start Wars
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
