Re: SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim & Mary Walker

On Mon, 19 Jun 2006 01:12:01 GMT, "John Jacobson" <Formerly Saved
<NoGod@xxxxxxx> wrote:

bass <manny@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
<8iqb921jjog67dkv5dcru3veo5blmua8c8@xxxxxxx>
However, nobody (at least no reputable scientist) have as yet made
any worthwhile extract from the DNA project.

Sorry, but that claim is just ridiculous. Google can remedy your misconception
on this score. (I'd do it for you, but I just spent a long time on several
other posts, and need to get doing a few other things that have nothing to do
with these interesting discussions we have going on here.)

Did several searches on Googles and as before, found many, many
interesting websites, articles and theories. However, as yet I have
not found any widely acclaimed or accepted scientific paper showing;

1. No common middle eastern bottleneck,
2. Showing Noah's non existince,
3. Showing that the Noah story is incorrect.

Perhaps they do exist, but I cannot find them. Perhaps you can point
me to to these scientific extracts in regards to our discussion.

I agree with you that there are uninterupted race histories far older
than the widely accepted recorded time line of the bible - take the
Aborigines known 10,000 year (30,000 years unknown) history for
example. This seems to be a contradiction on a massive scale and begs
for an answer. However, this does not neccessarily mean that the Bible
is flawed - it simply means that we do not have an answer to that
question. To make any other conclusion than that would be illogical.
Then science have now come up with "parallel time" - a concept so
bizarre and unique it defies logic as we know it.

Even Stephen Hawking states; "Any physical theory is always
provisional, in the sense that it is only a hypothesis: you can never
prove it. No matter how many times the results of experiments agree
with some theory, you can never be sure that the next time the result
will not contradict the theory."
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: test2
    ... I read groups through a newsreader, not Google. ... but they were showing up in Google. ... group on the reader, even though I knew they were showing up in ... I just erased the filters and entered them ...
    (rec.audio.opinion)
  • Re: test2
    ... I read groups through a newsreader, not Google. ... but they were showing up in Google. ... group on the reader, even though I knew they were showing up in ... I just erased the filters and entered them ...
    (rec.audio.opinion)
  • Re: test2
    ... I read groups through a newsreader, not Google. ... but they were showing up in Google. ... group on the reader, even though I knew they were showing up in Google. ... I just erased the filters and entered them ...
    (rec.audio.opinion)
  • Re: test2
    ... I read groups through a newsreader, not Google. ... but they were showing up in Google. ... group on the reader, even though I knew they were showing up in Google. ... Try not to filter yourself out in future, ...
    (rec.audio.opinion)
  • Re: How to extract links
    ... > To start, look at the java.net package, specifically the URL class, and the ... URL class from java.net package doesn't work for me (403 - google protection). ... than htmlunit to easy extract links. ...
    (comp.lang.java.programmer)